2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

ZZP Builds The Best LNF Mod Ever!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2011 | 11:12 PM
  #701  
cmiller8006's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 05-29-08
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by BLAZIN07SS
spinning the stock long block to 7200 on the s256et on 24psi. no valve float as of yet. springs/retainers/cams/cam gears/neutral balance shafts next year anyway
There have been multiple lsj's running 7200 rpms and never seem to have a problem. I know with my 7k redline on the stock turbo my cams and rollers, and followers showed signs of over revving. There was alot of wierd marks and some dimpling on one of the cams, I got it replaced under warranty though lol.
Reply
Old May 31, 2011 | 11:26 PM
  #702  
terry11's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 07-24-09
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
From: Lewisburg, Pa
Originally Posted by cmiller8006
There have been multiple lsj's running 7200 rpms and never seem to have a problem. I know with my 7k redline on the stock turbo my cams and rollers, and followers showed signs of over revving. There was alot of wierd marks and some dimpling on one of the cams, I got it replaced under warranty though lol.
Haha oh the infamous warranty. I may or may not have gotten 4 new transmissions out of it. 3 of which came post turbo swap
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 09:17 AM
  #703  
watrboy821's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-19-09
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
Originally Posted by cmiller8006
But think about it, you have the stock turbo and a 256 lets say, both at 25psi. The 256 will flow twice as much as the stocker. Your still at 25 psi there is just alot more air movement in there.
Agreed! For someone like me though, that really only wants about 360 whp, itshould be running lower PSI than that. What I hope to get out of this is more hp at lower boost to have added reliability. So I think at 360 whp, the airflow and boost might be low enough to keep the stock springs in there. I should be well into the 12's (my goal) with 360 whp too. Do you agree? Or still think I should do the springs?

Just so everyone knows, I know I can get high hp out of the stock turbo, but I don't want to do it that way.

I know the BNR or the 252 upgrade will get me to those results but I want something that is truly bolt up with no BOV to worry about.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 11:19 AM
  #704  
Sweetsandman's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: 01-15-09
Posts: 4,323
Likes: 0
From: Parma, OH
Originally Posted by watrboy821
I know the BNR or the 252 upgrade will get me to those results but I want something that is truly bolt up with no BOV to worry about.
You're worried about buying one or just the tuning? Because if it's the tuning...just do it right and run a recirc setup and you'll have no issues.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 12:59 PM
  #705  
JustACobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-22-11
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by cmiller8006
There have been multiple lsj's running 7200 rpms and never seem to have a problem. I know with my 7k redline on the stock turbo my cams and rollers, and followers showed signs of over revving. There was alot of wierd marks and some dimpling on one of the cams, I got it replaced under warranty though lol.
i dropped a valve @ 25 psi with a gt2871 and a 7k redline. only 30k miles, just a heads up.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 01:09 PM
  #706  
HHRSSouth's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-04-09
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Originally Posted by JustACobalt
i dropped a valve @ 25 psi with a gt2871 and a 7k redline. only 30k miles, just a heads up.
But didn't you do something stupid like downshift on accident?

Could be someone else I'm thinking of.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 01:21 PM
  #707  
JustACobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-22-11
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
i concluded that must have happened because everyone was running 7k with no problems but didnt realize the extra power i was making especially up top. plus how the hell would i mess up the 3-4 shift its just straight back? there was only one broken lash adjuster and if it revved to 9.5k from shifting to 2nd then i think i would have broken alot more than that.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2011 | 05:27 PM
  #708  
Sweetsandman's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: 01-15-09
Posts: 4,323
Likes: 0
From: Parma, OH
Bump for an update
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2011 | 05:38 PM
  #709  
cmiller8006's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 05-29-08
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by watrboy821
Agreed! For someone like me though, that really only wants about 360 whp, itshould be running lower PSI than that. What I hope to get out of this is more hp at lower boost to have added reliability. So I think at 360 whp, the airflow and boost might be low enough to keep the stock springs in there. I should be well into the 12's (my goal) with 360 whp too. Do you agree? Or still think I should do the springs?

Just so everyone knows, I know I can get high hp out of the stock turbo, but I don't want to do it that way.

I know the BNR or the 252 upgrade will get me to those results but I want something that is truly bolt up with no BOV to worry about.
If thats all you truely looking for and will be able to hold back the urge of having all that power at a touch of a button then you should be fine without them. But if you did springs you could easily rev out to 72-7400 on the stock motor and have a very nice power curve.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2011 | 10:15 PM
  #710  
turbo_chevy_cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-08
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: Huachuca city, AZ
Originally Posted by JustACobalt
i dropped a valve @ 25 psi with a gt2871 and a 7k redline. only 30k miles, just a heads up.
I had my gt2871 on the car for 45000 miles at 26psi and redline at 7000rpm and no problem with engine. And the another 3000 with the bnr gt2871 at 28psi and same redline.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2011 | 11:02 PM
  #711  
JustACobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-22-11
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
what manifold did you use with the first one? and why did u switch to the bnr?
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2011 | 11:22 PM
  #712  
drewbroo's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 12-21-08
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
From: TUCSON AZ
Originally Posted by JustACobalt
what manifold did you use with the first one? and why did u switch to the bnr?

He has the synapse S3 just like you
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 12:22 AM
  #713  
MTE's Avatar
MTE
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-30-09
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by watrboy821
I should be well into the 12's (my goal) with 360 whp too. Do you agree?
I only ran a 13.2 at 113 trap with 355 whp on street tires. But I suck at 1/4 runs so.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 02:23 AM
  #714  
ATLsilverSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-09
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Originally Posted by MTE
I only ran a 13.2 at 113 trap with 355 whp on street tires. But I suck at 1/4 runs so.
your trap indicates 12s are possible with a good launch
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 09:07 AM
  #715  
turbo_chevy_cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-08
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: Huachuca city, AZ
Originally Posted by JustACobalt
what manifold did you use with the first one? and why did u switch to the bnr?
Just like drewboo said i had synapse stage 3 kit. I switched to the bnr due to the turbo lag between 1st-2nd. I have a video of me racing a neon that shows the lag. I would show you but cant at work.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 10:09 AM
  #716  
BLAZIN07SS's Avatar
I'm too JDM for you
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-05-07
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
that's cause of the huge turbine side synapse sells with the kit. i think it was like a .84ar backhousing
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 10:54 AM
  #717  
cobaltssoverbooster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-30-08
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, Ca
Originally Posted by BLAZIN07SS
that's cause of the huge turbine side synapse sells with the kit. i think it was like a .84ar backhousing
ahh sounds like they did not do the turbine and compressor flow calculations when doing r&d
i mean its a good turbo still flows well but a turbine flow calculation would have solved most of that lag
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 09:48 PM
  #718  
Knightwolf's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-09
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Any dyno #'s on regular fuel? We don't even have E85 up here in Canada.. we have some ethanol blended crap which makes my car knock like a bitch if i use it lol.. think it's 10% ethanol or thereabouts. And to make matters worse, we're restricted to 91 octane, unless we use the 10% ethanol, which is 94.. it'd require a special tune I'm sure and since I'd bet the Usa doesn't have the same fuel, no tuner would want to deal with it either.
Just curious and wanting to know more details While waiting on any updates :P
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 10:27 PM
  #719  
cobaltssoverbooster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-30-08
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, Ca
Dude I get that blend down here in Florida tunes no different I think I got 2 degrees timing from it having slightly better cyl temps. Ur fuel must really blow up there

Originally Posted by Knightwolf
Any dyno #'s on regular fuel? We don't even have E85 up here in Canada.. we have some ethanol blended crap which makes my car knock like a bitch if i use it lol.. think it's 10% ethanol or thereabouts. And to make matters worse, we're restricted to 91 octane, unless we use the 10% ethanol, which is 94.. it'd require a special tune I'm sure and since I'd bet the Usa doesn't have the same fuel, no tuner would want to deal with it either.
Just curious and wanting to know more details While waiting on any updates :P
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 10:30 PM
  #720  
Mike_peperni's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-20-09
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Originally Posted by Knightwolf
Any dyno #'s on regular fuel? We don't even have E85 up here in Canada.. we have some ethanol blended crap which makes my car knock like a bitch if i use it lol.. think it's 10% ethanol or thereabouts. And to make matters worse, we're restricted to 91 octane, unless we use the 10% ethanol, which is 94.. it'd require a special tune I'm sure and since I'd bet the Usa doesn't have the same fuel, no tuner would want to deal with it either.
Just curious and wanting to know more details While waiting on any updates :P
I run 94 octane since day one and dont have any problem, the tune is alright.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 12:29 AM
  #721  
Knightwolf's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-09
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
I had Vince tuning with some of that 94 residing in my tank.. it knocked 4 degrees on the infiniboost tune.. had to dial it down. After that, it still knocked 1 or 2 degrees, but once the computer dialed in the shell 91 again, it subsided. I believe at WOT it's currently about 1 degree right now. Boost is like a max of 22 lbs and holds 21 if I remember rightly. Might need new plugs to take away that last degree.. they are a year old now.
It knocks 2-3 degrees on petro 91, but it seems to clean it out well. Shell seems to send a fair bit of smoke out the tailpipe when u go WOT, at least for a second or two. I don't drive it that hard all the time, just need to get on it once in a while to keep it cleaned out.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2011 | 11:17 AM
  #722  
Ladale22's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-07-10
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Cold Lake, Alberta
Could we PLEASE get an update on that turbo... at least where the testing is at right now...
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2011 | 11:27 AM
  #723  
mkriebs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-12-09
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by MTE
I only ran a 13.2 at 113 trap with 355 whp on street tires. But I suck at 1/4 runs so.
How the hell are you only running 113 with 355? that is one happy effin dyno! I was trapping 112 with 269whp...
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2011 | 12:34 PM
  #724  
PrincessTurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-09
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 1
From: In the mountains
Originally Posted by Ladale22
Could we PLEASE get an update on that turbo... at least where the testing is at right now...
Well it sounds like with a cam they have a big turbo running E85 on just the stock DI rail so be patient if you want it done right ....


I would like just a very very light estimation on the ETA for this kit as well so I can plan accordingly ....


How much is the cam ? Can we order them yet ?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2011 | 01:59 PM
  #725  
D-mac's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 03-14-10
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Knightwolf
I had Vince tuning with some of that 94 residing in my tank.. it knocked 4 degrees on the infiniboost tune.. had to dial it down. After that, it still knocked 1 or 2 degrees, but once the computer dialed in the shell 91 again, it subsided. I believe at WOT it's currently about 1 degree right now. Boost is like a max of 22 lbs and holds 21 if I remember rightly. Might need new plugs to take away that last degree.. they are a year old now.
It knocks 2-3 degrees on petro 91, but it seems to clean it out well. Shell seems to send a fair bit of smoke out the tailpipe when u go WOT, at least for a second or two. I don't drive it that hard all the time, just need to get on it once in a while to keep it cleaned out.
Most Gas in Canada has upto 10% Ethanol in it

Stick with the Shell 91 cause it has no Ethanol in it
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44 AM.