2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

ZZP EFR Turbo results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:17 AM
  #26  
Matt M's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Looks like peak boost on the ZFR pull was 25.7 and it looks to be a little under 25 at the peak hp.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 01:07 AM
  #27  
sfwg's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-19-08
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: oro valley az
wow! very nice!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 01:39 AM
  #28  
Fastgti69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
Great results. I have a question, that is the kn intake correct. Is there a silicone piece used to fit it like I see in that picture?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 11:10 AM
  #29  
Chase0224's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-16-09
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Sherrodsville, OH
i do have the k&n, zzp used some sort of coupler for it to fit.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 11:36 AM
  #30  
gone_in_10_sec's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-05-10
Posts: 805
Likes: 1
From: A.B.E. PA & Jacksonville FL
Originally Posted by Frogstofall
LNF >LSJ?
yep..

Matt - wait it's a ZFR what happen to EFR
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 11:41 AM
  #31  
rallycobalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 19,671
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
Originally Posted by gone_in_10_sec
yep..

Matt - wait it's a ZFR what happen to EFR
ZZP + EFR = ZFR

Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 11:47 AM
  #32  
Wangspeed's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-22-09
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 2
From: Northern Virginia
It's amazing how much sooner it spools, even though it puts out more power.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 11:49 AM
  #33  
RooTBeeR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 02-18-07
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, Ca
Very nice
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:01 PM
  #34  
rukkee's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 08-21-06
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by Chase0224
Final numbers were 473/428tq.
Am i reading that sheet wrong cause it looks like pull number 2 shows 473hp/443tq ? And run 1 was 428/418 ? Either way thou thats a great setup Chase ..... nice!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:02 PM
  #35  
MastaShaKe_88's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 08-24-10
Posts: 9,666
Likes: 0
From: Norf Cakalacky
so what do you think that turbo can max out at powerwise?

oh an how much??

Last edited by MastaShaKe_88; Apr 30, 2012 at 12:02 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:05 PM
  #36  
07LSJ's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 01-26-12
Posts: 3,398
Likes: 0
From: miami
Originally Posted by rukkee
Am i reading that sheet wrong cause it looks like pull number 2 shows 473hp/443tq ? And run 1 was 428/418 ? Either way thou thats a great setup Chase ..... nice!
he was comparing the 2 turbos.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:10 PM
  #37  
RooTBeeR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 02-18-07
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, Ca
Originally Posted by rukkee
Am i reading that sheet wrong cause it looks like pull number 2 shows 473hp/443tq ? And run 1 was 428/418 ? Either way thou thats a great setup Chase ..... nice!
yeah you're right i didnt even see that
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:17 PM
  #38  
Chevycobaltss3's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 1
From: Vine Grove Kentucky
Next time you dyno you guys should show a straight gas tune.. and on a stock block to show real turbo results. Good power though!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:18 PM
  #39  
rukkee's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 08-21-06
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by 07LSJ
he was comparing the 2 turbos.
Yep i saw that ....I just think he got his numbers swapped around on the final figure for his new setup 8)
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:19 PM
  #40  
MastaShaKe_88's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 08-24-10
Posts: 9,666
Likes: 0
From: Norf Cakalacky
Originally Posted by Chevycobaltss3
Next time you dyno you guys should show a straight gas tune.. and on a stock block to show real turbo results. Good power though!
^^^thiiisssssssss, I dont wanna strap this on with no cams,E85, etc an on a stock block an only pull 285whp like wtf
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:21 PM
  #41  
rukkee's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 08-21-06
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by Chevycobaltss3
Next time you dyno you guys should show a straight gas tune.. and on a stock block to show real turbo results. Good power though!
Oh ****!!!!! Wheres my popcorn .
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:30 PM
  #42  
Chevycobaltss3's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 1
From: Vine Grove Kentucky
Did I say anything that was disrespectful? He's on a 2.1 and on e47. People that have a balt more then likely will not have either. Same with Cams. So realisticly, I am sure people want to know pump gas numbers and stock block numbers...
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:45 PM
  #43  
Knightwolf's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-09
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by Chevycobaltss3
Did I say anything that was disrespectful? He's on a 2.1 and on e47. People that have a balt more then likely will not have either. Same with Cams. So realisticly, I am sure people want to know pump gas numbers and stock block numbers...
I agree with you, but I didn't really see anybody getting their panties in a knot. I'd like to know too, but who's going to do this without at least cams? 2.1 is alot of dough.. cams not so much so.. and just for my own wanting to know.. there is no E up here at all, so I'd like to see pump gas #'s personally. I'm guessing with our climate, there'll NEVER be any E up here, other than the normal 10% that's put into most fuels nowadays.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:54 PM
  #44  
sponge14's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-14-09
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
From: Anna, TX
Well this wasn't to show off the ZFR for a sales point of view, this is what he has done on his car so it's a take it as it is kind of deal. I'm sure when they release it we will get some stock car #'s.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:56 PM
  #45  
rukkee's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 08-21-06
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by Chevycobaltss3
Did I say anything that was disrespectful? He's on a 2.1 and on e47. People that have a balt more then likely will not have either. Same with Cams. So realisticly, I am sure people want to know pump gas numbers and stock block numbers...
No .... but with you and anything ZZP affiliated ....there is bound to be some "entertainment" lol
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:59 PM
  #46  
BlackhawkSS's Avatar
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-30-11
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
I don't know about anyone else, but I would not be getting Cams, probably valve springs though.

Only bolts on's, clutch, and new Turbo on 93 pump @ 25-26 psi.

If it puts 400-425 on this set up, i'm sold. Which I am sure it will.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 01:20 PM
  #47  
Knightwolf's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-09
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by BlackhawkSS
I don't know about anyone else, but I would not be getting Cams, probably valve springs though.

Only bolts on's, clutch, and new Turbo on 93 pump @ 25-26 psi.

If it puts 400-425 on this set up, i'm sold. Which I am sure it will.
I think it should put out more than that personally.. 425 minimum.. I don't know what I'm currently at, but it has to be 360whp+ and I'm still on stock turbo and I have at least 1 more bolt-on to go, other than clutch which I will be needing soon. Reason I say I must be that high is cuz I can hang with a 373whp Vette(up to 140mph) and they're only 200 lbs heavier and I had a passenger in my car, only 110 lbs, but still.. that's a marginal weight difference.

What's the difference between the EFR and the ZFR? Any at all, or did they just rename it to match their company name? Lol.. stupid question I know.. I know...
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 01:31 PM
  #48  
rallycobalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 19,671
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
Originally Posted by Knightwolf
What's the difference between the EFR and the ZFR? Any at all, or did they just rename it to match their company name? Lol.. stupid question I know.. I know...
the ZFR is an EFR modified by ZZP to fit stock turbo manifold & o2 housing..... what's modified about it? the exhaust housing on the turbo is cast with the proper flanges.

stock manifold is what's hurting it, BUT for a direct replacement to the stock turbo.... you can't beat it.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 02:45 PM
  #49  
Chase0224's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-16-09
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Sherrodsville, OH
Originally Posted by Wangspeed
It's amazing how much sooner it spools, even though it puts out more power.
thats exactly what i said.

Originally Posted by rukkee
Am i reading that sheet wrong cause it looks like pull number 2 shows 473hp/443tq ? And run 1 was 428/418 ? Either way thou thats a great setup Chase ..... nice!
sorry this thread was made as i was literally falling asleep in the computer chair lol. I probably just crossed the two

Originally Posted by MastaShaKe_88
so what do you think that turbo can max out at powerwise?

oh an how much??
I know what matt did with it but thats not my business to say. As far as price, once again thats not my place to say price.

Originally Posted by Chevycobaltss3
Next time you dyno you guys should show a straight gas tune.. and on a stock block to show real turbo results. Good power though!
This was just for my car, it wasnt for marketing or sales. They wanted to debut it on my car and of course i said yes. Im sure closer to release they will show numbers on a stock block.

Originally Posted by sponge14
Well this wasn't to show off the ZFR for a sales point of view, this is what he has done on his car so it's a take it as it is kind of deal. I'm sure when they release it we will get some stock car #'s.
exactly^^

Originally Posted by BlackhawkSS
I don't know about anyone else, but I would not be getting Cams, probably valve springs though.

Only bolts on's, clutch, and new Turbo on 93 pump @ 25-26 psi.

If it puts 400-425 on this set up, i'm sold. Which I am sure it will.
That might be possible, but chances are you will need cams due to needing the larger fuel lobe. Im sure zzp can comment on this. When they first put it on my car on the old BNR tune without changing any kind of boost (was at 22psi) and timing it made 420.

Originally Posted by Knightwolf
I think it should put out more than that personally.. 425 minimum.. I don't know what I'm currently at, but it has to be 360whp+ and I'm still on stock turbo and I have at least 1 more bolt-on to go, other than clutch which I will be needing soon. Reason I say I must be that high is cuz I can hang with a 373whp Vette(up to 140mph) and they're only 200 lbs heavier and I had a passenger in my car, only 110 lbs, but still.. that's a marginal weight difference.

What's the difference between the EFR and the ZFR? Any at all, or did they just rename it to match their company name? Lol.. stupid question I know.. I know...
On pump without the cam with the lobe it might be a little difficult, youll atleast need springs and retainers.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 02:57 PM
  #50  
SSlobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-22-09
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 7
From: Kathmandu
Originally Posted by Knightwolf
I think it should put out more than that personally.. 425 minimum.. I don't know what I'm currently at, but it has to be 360whp+ and I'm still on stock turbo and I have at least 1 more bolt-on to go, other than clutch which I will be needing soon. Reason I say I must be that high is cuz I can hang with a 373whp Vette(up to 140mph) and they're only 200 lbs heavier and I had a passenger in my car, only 110 lbs, but still.. that's a marginal weight difference.

What's the difference between the EFR and the ZFR? Any at all, or did they just rename it to match their company name? Lol.. stupid question I know.. I know...
You can't claim it without a graph. You'll get eaten up on this board. If you were truly at 360+ hp, you wouldn't be running around on the stock clutch and you would be on E.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 AM.