Exhaust Suggestions! Help!
12-02-2011, 03:31 PM
#56
I was enjoying my setup, matter of fact i didnt even say anything to u till u came at me wanting proof so i just asked u for the same thing. Either way both work and honestly i was just trolling u for last 8 post i still think the 3 in is best because why would zzp design it if 2.5 was better? And even make the statement of intended for sc in the info of the item
12-02-2011, 04:02 PM
#60
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 02-23-09
Location: Macedonia, OH
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im gonna go with, there is NO need for a 3 in with your basic bolt ons/tuned car. i had a 3 catless DP and the hahn 3in cat back. it was stupid loud sounded like ****. my buddy had the same set up was stupid loud, sounded like ****, but ran 12.5's........
So as stated before, unless going stupid heavy with the mods then there is no need for a 3 in.
a 2.5 will give you more flow, little more noise, sound better. and not scrape the speedbumps. had my car low enough that my exhaust was only 2 inches off the ground hit a small rut in the road pulled the exhaust apart...
Bottom line get the 2.5 in exhaust
So as stated before, unless going stupid heavy with the mods then there is no need for a 3 in.
a 2.5 will give you more flow, little more noise, sound better. and not scrape the speedbumps. had my car low enough that my exhaust was only 2 inches off the ground hit a small rut in the road pulled the exhaust apart...
Bottom line get the 2.5 in exhaust
12-02-2011, 08:10 PM
#61
Your powerful arguments have made me realize that I bigger exhaust is obviously the best choice. This is the exhaust I am looking at but I am wondering if anyone has any sound clips of it on a Balt
http://www.magnaflow.com/02product/s...ne=ALL&id=4105
http://www.magnaflow.com/02product/s...ne=ALL&id=4105
12-02-2011, 09:12 PM
#62
3" has potential to lose bottom end, but has more potential to gain top end...however all of that is based on how much your flowing, pushing a lot of boost(over 20psi) 3" should provide slightly better gains all around
however if you are closer to stock boost levels(under 20psi) 2.5 should provide a better power band
is that what yall wanted to hear?
however if you are closer to stock boost levels(under 20psi) 2.5 should provide a better power band
is that what yall wanted to hear?
12-02-2011, 09:13 PM
#63
Your powerful arguments have made me realize that I bigger exhaust is obviously the best choice. This is the exhaust I am looking at but I am wondering if anyone has any sound clips of it on a Balt
MagnaFlow Exhaust Products - For Trucks, Suv's, American Muscle, Diesel, & Sport Compact Vehicles
MagnaFlow Exhaust Products - For Trucks, Suv's, American Muscle, Diesel, & Sport Compact Vehicles
12-03-2011, 12:54 AM
#64
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 07-10-11
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hahahahaha thanks guys after reading all the comments im even more fucked up. I thinking 2.5 downpipe just because its a lil 4 banger with 200hp lmao. idk
12-03-2011, 01:53 AM
#66
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/dyno...5-dyno-246633/
12-03-2011, 01:55 AM
#67
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 07-10-11
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
**** you dude. if you dont have helpful adivce gtfo. your gonna come in here and call me a dumb ass because i asked a valid question. who cares if theres other theads about it.
12-03-2011, 02:07 AM
#71
i guess comprehension is not one of your strong points or lack of knowledge about this platform or both this is why the search button is a great tool so i will help you he is on the stock ex manifold and a shitty ass down pipe and a catback that is smaller then stock it dosent matter that he is on e85 or a tvs look at what he is doing with what he has a sc car isent as sensitve to ex pipe diameter as a snail car if you still dont get it then maybe you need some remedial classes on comprehension
12-03-2011, 02:29 AM
#72
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 07-10-11
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay..? exhaust may not be needed but it would give him better numbers. whats your point your trying to make. theres no proof at all saying the stock manifold and smaller catback is better so whats the point of posting that? i didnt ask if i needed a bugger exhaust or anything. i simply asked for suggestions on what would be a decent setup, meaning im getting something just dont know what would be a good setup. dont know why you had to come in and be a dick but this is a forum where people turn to for help, not to get some wise ass guy to run there mouth at them.
12-03-2011, 09:58 AM
#73
Okay..? exhaust may not be needed but it would give him better numbers. whats your point your trying to make. theres no proof at all saying the stock manifold and smaller catback is better so whats the point of posting that? i didnt ask if i needed a bugger exhaust or anything. i simply asked for suggestions on what would be a decent setup, meaning im getting something just dont know what would be a good setup. dont know why you had to come in and be a dick but this is a forum where people turn to for help, not to get some wise ass guy to run there mouth at them.
12-03-2011, 02:01 PM
#74
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 07-10-11
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how is this not directly about me? common now. and okay yeah you might be showing that his exhaust will work for 300+hp but im also saying thats who knows what a bigger exhaust will do. I never said i wanted a fatass exhaust or anything. My earlier post i said i was thinking on a badmab header= $160shipped and the zzp 2.5 downpipe= $119. Sure thanks for "trying" to give me valid info but theres better ways to do it then to come in here and pop off. And the 300 post comment? i dont get how i acted like i know anything about the lsj.. haha thats why im on here asking questions?