2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Hahn Racecraft LSJ GT35R Turbo Project PICS RELEASED!

Old Dec 28, 2007 | 02:04 AM
  #201  
MVP's Avatar
MVP
Junior Member
 
Joined: 08-06-06
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA.
man oh man. nice stuff. 06BLK what are we going to do now brother.

mad props to bill hahn and his crew.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 02:05 AM
  #202  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by MVP
man oh man. nice stuff.
Hi mike.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 02:10 AM
  #203  
MVP's Avatar
MVP
Junior Member
 
Joined: 08-06-06
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA.
Originally Posted by 06black
Hi mike.

sup buddy.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 04:35 PM
  #204  
IonNinja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-05
Posts: 7,915
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
One must bear in mind that a MAF sensor reads Mass Air Flow, which is not affected by pressure (density) changes. That's one reason why they are so damned accurate, as they 'see' mass airflow changes that are caused by pressure variations.

There are a couple more advantages to this method:

1. No re-wiring needed, as we have left the MAF in the stock location.
2. As the intake air temp sensor in our MAF location is reading actual intake air temperature delivered to the engine's cylinders (as opposed to ambient temp), it can react accurately to subtle aspects of charge air temperature (which increases with boost pressure) and intercooler performance; changes that would be missed by an ambient sensor. As this reading is used to calculate ignition timing, this is a significant factor. An ambient-only temp sensor is 'blind' to these changes.
this I did not know, thanx for the explinations to the both of you.

I do have another question though, if the MAF is not effected by pressure changes, what causes the MAF to "max out" in some instances?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 05:38 PM
  #205  
BCobaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
So B do you think this will top your 388whp setup you have on yours
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 06:17 PM
  #206  
Hahn RaceCraft's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 07-07-06
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by IonNinja
this I did not know, thanx for the explinations to the both of you.

I do have another question though, if the MAF is not effected by pressure changes, what causes the MAF to "max out" in some instances?
You're welcome! What causes the condition you describe is excessive airflow. The MAF outputs a frequency signal that the PCM interprets as airflow in pounds per minute (for instance). The PCM has an upper limit threshold set. Exceed that threshold, and you have 'maxed out' the MAF.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #207  
chevysalesman614's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
looks really good.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 11:17 PM
  #208  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
You're welcome! What causes the condition you describe is excessive airflow. The MAF outputs a frequency signal that the PCM interprets as airflow in pounds per minute (for instance). The PCM has an upper limit threshold set. Exceed that threshold, and you have 'maxed out' the MAF.
G/sec

lol i was blowing by the maf limits at first, once i re-worked the charge pipe i'm good now, toward its limits but still on the chart.

bill do you guys have any worries on this? if this guy has the ported head he clames(not sure if hes a stock cam)then its possibile, highly unlikely with the oem cam but possibile.

we ran outta maf on DJT's car with the 272's and his holset, stock head.

Originally Posted by BCobaltSS
So B do you think this will top your 388whp setup you have on yours
we dont know yet, none the less my plans are still in motion for "phase 3" of this project, once thats accomplished i have no worries beside fullthrottles car.

Originally Posted by IonNinja
this I did not know, thanx for the explinations to the both of you.

I do have another question though, if the MAF is not effected by pressure changes, what causes the MAF to "max out" in some instances?
**** air flow numbers......

Last edited by 06black; Dec 28, 2007 at 11:17 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 11:27 PM
  #209  
StinkBOMB's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-11-06
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 0
From: Hubert NC
Originally Posted by 06black
G/sec

lol i was blowing by the maf limits at first, once i re-worked the charge pipe i'm good now, toward its limits but still on the chart.

bill do you guys have any worries on this? if this guy has the ported head he clames(not sure if hes a stock cam)then its possibile, highly unlikely with the oem cam but possibile.

we ran outta maf on DJT's car with the 272's and his holset, stock head
.
I am curious as well. Even with big MAF setups GT35R's are simply too much for many MAFs. Without taking up too much of your time or prying too much into your bag of tricks are you on stock ECU for this project Mr. Hahn?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 11:31 PM
  #210  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by MVP
man oh man. nice stuff. 06BLK what are we going to do now brother.

mad props to bill hahn and his crew.
not worried man, i'm always one step a head of the curve bro, you know this.
who says a project ever has to end? i think bill will even agree with that!
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 12:32 AM
  #211  
spaz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 1
From: Calgary,Canada
Aren't the extra injectors going to compensate for running out of maf headroom.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 12:37 AM
  #212  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by spaz
Aren't the extra injectors going to compensate for running out of maf headroom.
how you draw that conclusion, i'll never know.

once your off the chart(past maf freq range) it doesn't matter how much fuel you have to play with, the ECM has no way to calculate for it, it'll use its last value and run from that.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 12:59 AM
  #213  
spaz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 1
From: Calgary,Canada
The extra injectors are controled by an external stand alone unit from what I could gather. Is it poss to use a ls2 maf. and rescale it. Or bigger piping and once again rescale it. OR Maybe I am retarded and none of this makes sence.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 01:04 AM
  #214  
Hahn RaceCraft's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 07-07-06
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by spaz
Aren't the extra injectors going to compensate for running out of maf headroom.
Bingo!

Originally Posted by 06black
once your off the chart(past maf freq range) it doesn't matter how much fuel you have to play with, the ECM has no way to calculate for it, it'll use its last value and run from that.
Our PortFueler module controls the additional injectors independently of the ECM. We are not limited by this factor.

Last edited by Hahn RaceCraft; Dec 29, 2007 at 01:05 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 01:06 AM
  #215  
spike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 1
From: IN
^^ i have heard about that ls2 maf thing 2 and i think it will but i would like 2 know if someone has done it........
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 01:06 AM
  #216  
Hahn RaceCraft's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 07-07-06
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by spaz
The extra injectors are controled by an external stand alone unit from what I could gather. Is it poss to use a ls2 maf. and rescale it. Or bigger piping and once again rescale it. OR Maybe I am retarded and none of this makes sence.
With PortFueler, we just don't need to swap MAF's. We can retain the stock MAF and enjoy all the advantages of doing so, but not be limited by it.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 01:11 AM
  #217  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
Bingo!


Our PortFueler module controls the additional injectors independently of the ECM. We are not limited by this factor.
the port fueler runs of MAP tho correct?

it doesn't tie into the maf, just a manifold vacuum line or a map signal wire? rite?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 01:31 AM
  #218  
Hahn RaceCraft's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 07-07-06
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by 06black
the port fueler runs of MAP tho correct?

it doesn't tie into the maf, just a manifold vacuum line or a map signal wire? rite?
I should explain the system in greater detail.

The PortFueler control module reads RPM and manifold pressure. The module contains its own internal MAP sensor, good to approx. 30 PSI boost. The boost/vacuum signal for this sensor is sourced at the intake manifold.

The internal MAP reading and RPM are used to access values on a two-axis map grid that looks just like a VE table in HPTuners, for instance. Tuning consists of selecting correct values for the different RPM/MAP points on the map grid.

This map grid, in turn, controls the additional injectors. We've shipped hundreds of these systems for other applications, and the feedback is excellent...folks appear to be able to immediately understand and tune the system.

Of course, in our complete turbosystems, the PortFueler maps will be already pre-calibrated. End users can still fine-tune as needed.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 01:39 AM
  #219  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
I should explain the system in greater detail.

The PortFueler control module reads RPM and manifold pressure. The module contains its own internal MAP sensor, good to approx. 30 PSI boost. The boost/vacuum signal for this sensor is sourced at the intake manifold.

The internal MAP reading and RPM are used to access values on a two-axis map grid that looks just like a VE table in HPTuners, for instance. Tuning consists of selecting correct values for the different RPM/MAP points on the map grid.

This map grid, in turn, controls the additional injectors. We've shipped hundreds of these systems for other applications, and the feedback is excellent...folks appear to be able to immediately understand and tune the system.

Of course, in our complete turbosystems, the PortFueler maps will be already pre-calibrated. End users can still fine-tune as needed.
i got ya, i think of it like a window switch for a NOS or even more like a meth kit.

vary simple, and extremely effective.

your not bound by factory ECM's or MAF's, ect and it'll still spray no matter what the boost is as long as your turn on point is below 30psi and you have enough fuel pressure.

vary cool dear sir, vary snazzy indeed.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 09:23 AM
  #220  
luciano23456's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-02-07
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Ft Hood, TX not by choice
best thread.......EVER! finding out that there was a lsj kit by hahn in r&d is the reason i havent gotten one as of thus far....drive on my good, and kind sir........drive on.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 10:23 AM
  #221  
spaz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 1
From: Calgary,Canada
Originally Posted by spaz
Aren't the extra injectors going to compensate for running out of maf headroom.
Originally Posted by 06black
how you draw that conclusion, i'll never know.

once your off the chart(past maf freq range) it doesn't matter how much fuel you have to play with, the ECM has no way to calculate for it, it'll use its last value and run from that.
See I'm not retarded.

I Can't wait for the release of this kit. Do you think before summer?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 12:44 PM
  #222  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by spaz
See I'm not retarded.

I Can't wait for the release of this kit. Do you think before summer?
sure you are.

this has no connection to the MAF what so ever.

my point still stands as valid and correct.

also, i think bill had mentioned that he was planing on having the kit out before summer rolls around.
however i am familiar with the needed R&D behind a project like this and if it doesn't make it out till summer or later i wont be suprised nor disappointed.

its always better to release a kit thats a bit late rather then a kit thats unfinished in any regard.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 12:46 PM
  #223  
SSdan's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-17-06
Posts: 6,266
Likes: 1
From: between heaven and hell
Originally Posted by spaz
See I'm not retarded.

I Can't wait for the release of this kit. Do you think before summer?
Originally Posted by 06black
sure you are.

this has no connection to the MAF what so ever.

my point still stands as valid and correct.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #224  
hizzo3's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 11-03-07
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, tx
What are the chances of this being modded to fit the 2.4L?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 01:13 PM
  #225  
SilverSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-03-05
Posts: 4,272
Likes: 0
From: South Bend , Indiana
Originally Posted by hizzo3
What are the chances of this being modded to fit the 2.4L?
They already have stuff for the 2.4 .
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM.