long road to ruin
pot calling the kettle black!
Last edited by hatrickstu; Aug 10, 2008 at 12:25 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
How much did the TVS blower set you back Area? How much hp/tq can you expect with the TVS on a stock cam with a 3.1 pulley VS a 2.75 after you tune for it? Also what do you mean by 7gph is that a different fuel pump?
with his engine the ability to flow much more air you wont run into as much boost stacking nor as much PD across the intake manifold with the same size pulley as a "stock" engine car. Tus his AIT's wont suffer until he starts to attain a larger cylinder air mass that would cause air to back up and build boost.
its not just RPM that causes heat, its the extra air by compressed ageist its self in a consistent volume that does. the tvs will only put out X amount of air per rev thus, he'll need more revs to build pressure. as the delta-P jumps so will head flow....but also heat, however it wont happen on his motor until he gets the rev's needed to build more "boost"
so once again, with that CR, head work, ect the engine will use a much larger portion of the air put out by the tvs, thus requiring smaller pulleys to build enough positive pressure that will generate the needed head flow for big power.
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
ehhh....
with his engine the ability to flow much more air you wont run into as much boost stacking nor as much PD across the intake manifold with the same size pulley as a "stock" engine car. Tus his AIT's wont suffer until he starts to attain a larger cylinder air mass that would cause air to back up and build boost.
its not just RPM that causes heat, its the extra air by compressed ageist its self in a consistent volume that does. the tvs will only put out X amount of air per rev thus, he'll need more revs to build pressure. as the delta-P jumps so will head flow....but also heat, however it wont happen on his motor until he gets the rev's needed to build more "boost"
so once again, with that CR, head work, ect the engine will use a much larger portion of the air put out by the tvs, thus requiring smaller pulleys to build enough positive pressure that will generate the needed head flow for big power.
with his engine the ability to flow much more air you wont run into as much boost stacking nor as much PD across the intake manifold with the same size pulley as a "stock" engine car. Tus his AIT's wont suffer until he starts to attain a larger cylinder air mass that would cause air to back up and build boost.
its not just RPM that causes heat, its the extra air by compressed ageist its self in a consistent volume that does. the tvs will only put out X amount of air per rev thus, he'll need more revs to build pressure. as the delta-P jumps so will head flow....but also heat, however it wont happen on his motor until he gets the rev's needed to build more "boost"
so once again, with that CR, head work, ect the engine will use a much larger portion of the air put out by the tvs, thus requiring smaller pulleys to build enough positive pressure that will generate the needed head flow for big power.
Hopefully the engine is back on it's way tomorrow. The block passed the zyglo test and is being assembled this weekend.
Well that makes me feel better. I chose to get the 70 & 63 mm pulleys and I can borrow the 75 for the initial tuning from a local TVS test pilot.
Hopefully the engine is back on it's way tomorrow. The block passed the zyglo test and is being assembled this weekend.
Hopefully the engine is back on it's way tomorrow. The block passed the zyglo test and is being assembled this weekend.
Thread Starter
Rent me! per hour

Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
my tires are fine. i really don't feel the need to break the drivetrain right now. that who lack of fund deal doesn't set well with me and my daily driver.
id rather spin than break something, and the whole stock clutch thing isn't going to hold et streets as it is. me personally. id prefer the tires to be the weak link in traction devices, not the axles or the clutch.
call me silly, but spinning doesn't bother me a bit
id rather spin than break something, and the whole stock clutch thing isn't going to hold et streets as it is. me personally. id prefer the tires to be the weak link in traction devices, not the axles or the clutch.
call me silly, but spinning doesn't bother me a bit
Thread Starter
Rent me! per hour

Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
::sad face::
i will say the car is an absolute riot above 5k rpms now
Damn, which injectors you running again?
I sometimes hit 82% on the 79's at peak boost when it's cold, but usually only 72-73.
as for the top end power, that's why I did the turbo swap, I like having traction down loe (but the abilty to completely rip the tires loose through 120+mph when I want to lol)
***** going down this fall man.
I'm hitting the dyno again with the new pump and injectors since I never dyno'd the current setup yet. 411whp was with a 17.2 afr and a burnt out fuel pump on 60's. If I had time to put the meth in she'd be making 430-440whp no prob on pump gas
I sometimes hit 82% on the 79's at peak boost when it's cold, but usually only 72-73.
as for the top end power, that's why I did the turbo swap, I like having traction down loe (but the abilty to completely rip the tires loose through 120+mph when I want to lol)
***** going down this fall man.
I'm hitting the dyno again with the new pump and injectors since I never dyno'd the current setup yet. 411whp was with a 17.2 afr and a burnt out fuel pump on 60's. If I had time to put the meth in she'd be making 430-440whp no prob on pump gas
Last edited by 06blackg85ss; Aug 10, 2008 at 01:36 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Damn, which injectors you running again?
I sometimes hit 82% on the 79's at peak boost when it's cold, but usually only 72-73.
as for the top end power, that's why I did the turbo swap, I like having traction down loe (but the abilty to completely rip the tires loose through 120+mph when I want to lol)
***** going down this fall man.
I'm hitting the dyno again with the new pump and injectors since I never dyno'd the current setup yet. 411whp was with a 17.2 afr and a burnt out fuel pump on 60's. If I had time to put the meth in she'd be making 430-440whp no prob on pump gas
I sometimes hit 82% on the 79's at peak boost when it's cold, but usually only 72-73.
as for the top end power, that's why I did the turbo swap, I like having traction down loe (but the abilty to completely rip the tires loose through 120+mph when I want to lol)
***** going down this fall man.
I'm hitting the dyno again with the new pump and injectors since I never dyno'd the current setup yet. 411whp was with a 17.2 afr and a burnt out fuel pump on 60's. If I had time to put the meth in she'd be making 430-440whp no prob on pump gas
trans
its only a matter of time
by the way area the guy that owned my car before me found me and turns out you tuned his car with 42's and a 2.8 and meth, i only have a 2.9 no meth, i'll need to make some money and see if you can retune it it runs rich and is pulling 30* is the most i've seen on the interceptor
Thread Starter
Rent me! per hour

Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
im still on the 60's paul
also keep in mind, i don't make peak power till about 74-7500 rpms now due to the blower and cam combo. idc screams above 7200
cobaltcc. i KNEW hat car looked familiar. if need be, i have the stage 2 tune file for that car i can load into it for the time being.
also keep in mind, i don't make peak power till about 74-7500 rpms now due to the blower and cam combo. idc screams above 7200
cobaltcc. i KNEW hat car looked familiar. if need be, i have the stage 2 tune file for that car i can load into it for the time being.
im still on the 60's paul
also keep in mind, i don't make peak power till about 74-7500 rpms now due to the blower and cam combo. idc screams above 7200
cobaltcc. i KNEW hat car looked familiar. if need be, i have the stage 2 tune file for that car i can load into it for the time being.
also keep in mind, i don't make peak power till about 74-7500 rpms now due to the blower and cam combo. idc screams above 7200
cobaltcc. i KNEW hat car looked familiar. if need be, i have the stage 2 tune file for that car i can load into it for the time being.
im still on the 60's paul
also keep in mind, i don't make peak power till about 74-7500 rpms now due to the blower and cam combo. idc screams above 7200
cobaltcc. i KNEW hat car looked familiar. if need be, i have the stage 2 tune file for that car i can load into it for the time being.
also keep in mind, i don't make peak power till about 74-7500 rpms now due to the blower and cam combo. idc screams above 7200
cobaltcc. i KNEW hat car looked familiar. if need be, i have the stage 2 tune file for that car i can load into it for the time being.
would that make the car run any better?
oh that I know. I got 2 cars and all the parts necessary to rebuild the car sitting in storage at my job/ Should it die, it will be back stronger pretty quickly
Last edited by 06blackg85ss; Aug 10, 2008 at 01:56 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost


