2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Lysholm 1.6 Twinscrew - En route to power!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 11:45 AM
  #376  
BoomInIt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-24-05
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: new orleans
If i remember correctly, with my 1200ax set-up, I made 315-325 on 93 and I am at 350whp+ on e85-e100...with full 1.75" primaries and 3" full exhaust, ported head and a bunch of cooling mods. With more fuel there is a potential for 370whp+ with agressive tune. Putting a bigger blower on is almost pointless without a ported head its a night and day difference in power potential for the twinscrew especially with the 1.6
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 11:48 AM
  #377  
SuperSport4's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Miami
how do you guys think this will do on a car with ported and polished head and cams??
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 11:54 AM
  #378  
BoomInIt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-24-05
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: new orleans
Originally Posted by SuperSport4
how do you guys think this will do on a car with ported and polished head and cams??
Easy 400+ with the 1.6L ported head + other mods and lots of fuel! I went over 400+whp with the 1.2 and some juice.

Last edited by BoomInIt; Aug 2, 2011 at 11:56 AM. Reason: .
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 12:40 PM
  #379  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
Originally Posted by BoomInIt
Easy 400+ with the 1.6L ported head + other mods and lots of fuel! I went over 400+whp with the 1.2 and some juice.
any graphs? not that i dont believe you but id love to see the tourque curve on that bitch with the twinscrew and juice!
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 01:01 PM
  #380  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by BoomInIt
If i remember correctly, with my 1200ax set-up, I made 315-325 on 93 and I am at 350whp+ on e85-e100...
Can you post your dyno sheet please?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 02:36 PM
  #381  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by BoomInIt
If i remember correctly, with my 1200ax set-up, I made 315-325 on 93 and I am at 350whp+ on e85-e100...with full 1.75" primaries and 3" full exhaust, ported head and a bunch of cooling mods. With more fuel there is a potential for 370whp+ with agressive tune. Putting a bigger blower on is almost pointless without a ported head its a night and day difference in power potential for the twinscrew especially with the 1.6
pretty much what is expected, same as the tvs
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 05:18 PM
  #382  
defo98's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-16-09
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey then. Now Orlando Florida
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
pretty much what is expected, same as the tvs
thats with the 1200ax the lysholm there putting on is the 1600
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 05:48 PM
  #383  
chood711's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-08-07
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by defo98
thats with the 1200ax the lysholm there putting on is the 1600
no use responding to him
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 05:53 PM
  #384  
nizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 05-13-07
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 2
From: Sea-Town
Originally Posted by chood711
no use responding to him
this! His only response (summarized) would be "get a turbo, it makes more power. I dont care if you want a SC with no boost lag. Get a turbo. Turbo turbo turbo."
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 09:30 PM
  #385  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by defo98
thats with the 1200ax the lysholm there putting on is the 1600
they can put a 10 liter blower on there, without the additional work and parts to help the air get in and out faster, it's not going to be much better, if any at all.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 09:32 PM
  #386  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by nizzle
this! His only response (summarized) would be "get a turbo, it makes more power. I dont care if you want a SC with no boost lag. Get a turbo. Turbo turbo turbo."
a proper turbo setup don't have lag, bad info.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 09:33 PM
  #387  
nizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 05-13-07
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 2
From: Sea-Town
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
a proper turbo setup don't have lag, bad info.
Every turbo set up had lag. A good setup may have less or even close to no lag, but it still has lag. Anywho, back on topic
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 10:07 PM
  #388  
Leafydialupking's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-29-10
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: NH
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
they can put a 10 liter blower on there, without the additional work and parts to help the air get in and out faster, it's not going to be much better, if any at all.
exactly. Which is why this part had been toted from the beginning as for ported head only.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 10:22 PM
  #389  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by nizzle
Every turbo set up had lag. A good setup may have less or even close to no lag, but it still has lag. Anywho, back on topic
i won't get into that debate with you because you've shown your lack of knowledge in the area plenty of times
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 10:29 PM
  #390  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by Leafydialupking
exactly. Which is why this part had been toted from the beginning as for ported head only.
yep and this is why i was gawking at the people talking about these massive gains with this thing. it's going to take an extra couple grand in parts from a stock car to do anything at all. but hell with all that money, wasn't there an m62 car with that stroker motor that made 400hp? lol
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 10:33 PM
  #391  
Leafydialupking's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-29-10
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: NH
Yes and it reved to 9500 RPM's to make that power. That kind of power can be had on the MP62 you just need custom cams and the willingness to rev the **** out of it. Or the ***** to run the LE5 bottom end on a 2.0 head (11:1 comp ratio), e85, porting, custom cams, and such, MP62 with a 2.6 ring on that setup with a custom header should make 400 hp at 7000 rpm's rather than 9000, like the zzp stroker. Or at least thats what computer simulation tells me.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 10:56 PM
  #392  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by Leafydialupking
Yes and it reved to 9500 RPM's to make that power. That kind of power can be had on the MP62 you just need custom cams and the willingness to rev the **** out of it. Or the ***** to run the LE5 bottom end on a 2.0 head (11:1 comp ratio), e85, porting, custom cams, and such, MP62 with a 2.6 ring on that setup with a custom header should make 400 hp at 7000 rpm's rather than 9000, like the zzp stroker. Or at least thats what computer simulation tells me.
he dident spin it that high at the time they could only go to the stock pcm limit of 8152 now its a different i do believe i pretty sure they found a way around it
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 10:57 PM
  #393  
Leafydialupking's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-29-10
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: NH
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
he dident spin it that high at the time they could only go to the stock pcm limit of 8152 now its a different i do believe i pretty sure they found a way around it
Yup, just have to disconnect the speed sensor.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 11:02 PM
  #394  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by Leafydialupking
Yup, just have to disconnect the speed sensor.
if you do that the rpm multiplier dosent work they are getting a mph reading from one of the wheel bearings i dont remember which but you haave to have the rpm multiplier working
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 11:09 PM
  #395  
Tennpenn83's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-12-07
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 1
From: Columbus, Ohio
IIRC it was the passenger rear wheel bearing.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 11:32 PM
  #396  
100% METH's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 01-02-10
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 15
From: Los Angeles
interesting... say more
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2011 | 12:09 AM
  #397  
BoomInIt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-24-05
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: new orleans
Originally Posted by zrated89
any graphs? not that i dont believe you but id love to see the tourque curve on that bitch with the twinscrew and juice!
Unfortunately my laptop that had my hp tune files and dyno charts was stolen. I am swapping my motor and tranny soon with some additional parts and will re dyno. Its my daily driver so whenever i get to it I will post some results. The torque steer is pretty serious! Throttle is very responsive with 16psi around 2000rpms. It took some time to get the kit the right from RAWS mistakes.

Last edited by BoomInIt; Aug 3, 2011 at 12:14 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2011 | 12:44 AM
  #398  
100% METH's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 01-02-10
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 15
From: Los Angeles
No doubt, I believe it!

@ Boominit

When we took the 1600ax out for a spin on the 3.8 pulley making 20.5 psi by 7400 rpm... it felt incredible. So much room left to pulley it down too... The 1600ax on a 3.4 pulley should have no problem hitting 400whp, on a ported head of course.

Just need to tune it smart and the stock bottom end will do just fine.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2011 | 07:19 AM
  #399  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
they can put a 10 liter blower on there, without the additional work and parts to help the air get in and out faster, it's not going to be much better, if any at all.
I'm sorry, but I have to agree with this....

No one ever wants to build the motor up correctly from the start with these larger blowers (TVS & Twinscrew options). Yes, you can make decent power on a stock block and head with some tuning knowledge & the proper octane but.... for all out power you will need to get into some engine work. If I were to purchase one of these blowers, I would build my engine first following the GM LSJ build book. Then I would slap the blower on, get it tuned, and enjoy.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2011 | 09:16 AM
  #400  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by Staged07SS
I'm sorry, but I have to agree with this....

No one ever wants to build the motor up correctly from the start with these larger blowers (TVS & Twinscrew options). Yes, you can make decent power on a stock block and head with some tuning knowledge & the proper octane but.... for all out power you will need to get into some engine work. If I were to purchase one of these blowers, I would build my engine first following the GM LSJ build book. Then I would slap the blower on, get it tuned, and enjoy.
Live life on the edge!
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:33 AM.