New Official Dyno Thread (2012)
All I added was a BRFPS and a new dyno tune. 100 degrees ambient temp today too! The AFR's have error (measured at tail pipe, in car they were richer). My runs were repeatable, we played with the MBC quite a bit.
472WHP/427WTQ Verified Dynomite I/H/DP/E/T/80s/BRFPS/TK/20g/CD/PH/IM/IC/FI/PI/E-85
472WHP/427WTQ Verified Dynomite I/H/DP/E/T/80s/BRFPS/TK/20g/CD/PH/IM/IC/FI/PI/E-85
That 472 is at 27 PSI dropping down to 24 at 7000. Internally wastegated and its still a fairly controllable boost level with just a Turboxs HPBC.
Thanks all, yeah I rebuilt the 20g with new bearings, seals, etc. Painted it and tested it before reinstalling.
Traction is crap. Its even more noticeable in 3rd gear now. The OTTP rotated mounts are keeping me from wheel hop though. Its smooth when the tires spin and finally regain traction.
Thanks all, yeah I rebuilt the 20g with new bearings, seals, etc. Painted it and tested it before reinstalling.
Traction is crap. Its even more noticeable in 3rd gear now. The OTTP rotated mounts are keeping me from wheel hop though. Its smooth when the tires spin and finally regain traction.
I wondering about the dyno setup, was there a current or water brake installed on the dyno, if there isnt enough resistance or the settings are too low to load the cars engine properly the reading will be off. That is why dynos can read different from dyno to dyno among other things like correction. A dyno is only as good as its brake.
That was one of the first things I asked when I went to GPI (Gwatney Performance Innovations), they told me all about their dyno and the brake system. I think it was a 50,000 dollar setup or something like that. https://www.google.com/search?q=eddy...h=712&imgdii=_
The biggest thing you have working against you here is that the m62 is proven over and over and there is lots of data back up that your graph is reading a bit high.
That was one of the first things I asked when I went to GPI (Gwatney Performance Innovations), they told me all about their dyno and the brake system. I think it was a 50,000 dollar setup or something like that. https://www.google.com/search?q=eddy...h=712&imgdii=_
The biggest thing you have working against you here is that the m62 is proven over and over and there is lots of data back up that your graph is reading a bit high.
Last edited by c130aviator; Jun 30, 2013 at 09:29 PM.
I wondering about the dyno setup, was there a current or water brake installed on the dyno, if there isnt enough resistance or the settings are too low to load the cars engine properly the reading will be off. That is why dynos can read different from dyno to dyno among other things like correction. A dyno is only as good as its brake.
That was one of the first things I asked when I went to GPI (Gwatney Performance Innovations), they told me all about their dyno and the brake system. I think it was a 50,000 dollar setup or something like that. https://www.google.com/search?q=eddy...h=712&imgdii=_
The biggest thing you have working against you here is that the m62 is proven over and over and there is lots of data back up that your graph is reading a bit high.
That was one of the first things I asked when I went to GPI (Gwatney Performance Innovations), they told me all about their dyno and the brake system. I think it was a 50,000 dollar setup or something like that. https://www.google.com/search?q=eddy...h=712&imgdii=_
The biggest thing you have working against you here is that the m62 is proven over and over and there is lots of data back up that your graph is reading a bit high.