Pictures & Videos Your pictures, photoshops, and videos.

Official 2009 Photography Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 11:10 PM
  #276  
SKCobalt's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 03-16-07
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
That looks pretty cool... so there are fisheye adapters? I thought you had to buy a full on fisheye lens
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 11:14 PM
  #277  
sick06cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Originally Posted by Spectral
sick06 - the fist two are great!! the third one is awesome too i just don't like the fingers that you can just barely see at the bottom of the photo.

SKCobalt - Very nice picture. I wish the trees weren't so cluttered covering the bottom portion of the building. But hey what are you gonna do right? haha
I had to keep them in because otherwise i dont look right... to me it adds attitude...

EDIT: I think I should add that this was manually focused by taking multiple shots to get where i needed to stand right... along with focusing.. i dont have a chord...
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 11:53 PM
  #278  
Doh's Avatar
Doh
Member
 
Joined: 12-05-07
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan
I'm taking a media/computer course and we learn about photography, so I really am starting to get into it. Here's a couple I took for class.

And i'm also looking into getting a Canon Rebel (XS or XSi) once I can fork up the money.



Old Jan 20, 2009 | 11:53 PM
  #279  
titaniumss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-15-04
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Blue Springs, MO
Originally Posted by cereal83
Soon you guys are going to have cameras worth more then your cars with the way u people are thinking. Unless photography is your career, you don't need a camera like that.

My girlfriend and I are both photographers. We will be doing weddings this year so it will turn into a side career

SKCobalt - I like that one more! And adapters will give you the effect but not nearly the quality as an actual lens. You get what you pay for.

David - those pictures make me want to get rid of my lights and get the full Elinchrom kit.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 12:05 AM
  #280  
sick06cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
lol these were with one 430 lol... just to let you know..
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 02:13 AM
  #281  
Spectral's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-30-06
Posts: 11,850
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, Washington
So what do you guys use to pack all your gear in??

I've got a lowpro mini trekker AW and i love it!
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:13 AM
  #282  
myfakeevo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-20-08
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
From: rochester ny
Originally Posted by Spectral
So what do you guys use to pack all your gear in??

I've got a lowpro mini trekker AW and i love it!
a canon rebel bag, i have to have matching gear


like i even know what im doing
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 08:28 AM
  #283  
sick06cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
i use a expedtion 7x from tamrac when im traveling or going hiking.. but when im doing a shoot i usually take my new crumpler 6mdh
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 08:44 AM
  #284  
cereal83's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-08
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
I use some Lowpro backpack that can hold a laptop, 2 bodies and like 6 lens or something like that. Was just under $200 Can
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 11:04 AM
  #285  
titaniumss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-15-04
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Blue Springs, MO
Yes but I have no softboxes or stands or adapters yet, so it makes it easier for me to get rid of things.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 11:12 AM
  #286  
07LaserBlueSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-07-06
Posts: 2,077
Likes: 0
From: Nowheresville
Originally Posted by cereal83
Soon you guys are going to have cameras worth more then your cars with the way u people are thinking. Unless photography is your career, you don't need a camera like that.
It doesn't hurt to have a few toys does it? Some people just enjoy taking pictures.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 11:25 AM
  #287  
cereal83's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-08
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by 07LaserBlueSS
It doesn't hurt to have a few toys does it? Some people just enjoy taking pictures.
I agree but thats alot of money. I mean if you have it sure but I don't even think some of the people who want them have taken their current camera to the limits and I guess they think if they buy a $7000 camera, it will make them better.

Old Jan 21, 2009 | 01:19 PM
  #288  
sick06cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Originally Posted by cereal83
I agree but thats alot of money. I mean if you have it sure but I don't even think some of the people who want them have taken their current camera to the limits and I guess they think if they buy a $7000 camera, it will make them better.

troof.... i hate it when people think the following:
1. man that camera has (insert large number of megapixels) it must be alot better than that other one that only had (insert smaller number of pixels). say the 50d or 5d MK II vs a 1dmkIII
2. man I have a canon 1d MK III I can shoot awesome photos!
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 01:56 PM
  #289  
BigTizzle903's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-28-07
Posts: 3,186
Likes: 0
From: Middletown, NY
Originally Posted by cruisn
todays shot: not really for c&c jsut playin aroudn with that fish eye adapter, understanding it has to use a large aperture to get everything in focus so ignore the edges. lol


Maybe this is why I can't get anything to focus with my wide angle adapter I just got. I gotta check that out.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 01:59 PM
  #290  
sick06cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Originally Posted by BigTizzle903
Maybe this is why I can't get anything to focus with my wide angle adapter I just got. I gotta check that out.
guys you have to realize that a large aperture is a small number and a small aperture is a large number...

for example my 85 1.8 wide open- the widest it can go is 1.8 while the smallest it can go is 22.

to get more in focus you would want a bigger number..
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 02:55 PM
  #291  
BigTizzle903's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-28-07
Posts: 3,186
Likes: 0
From: Middletown, NY
I do understand that, but what I'm saying is I have my lens on auto focus, and when I find a subkect to shoot the camera tries to focus, but the image just doesn't come into focus and then it wont take the picture.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:15 PM
  #292  
Spectral's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-30-06
Posts: 11,850
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, Washington
Originally Posted by cereal83
I agree but thats alot of money. I mean if you have it sure but I don't even think some of the people who want them have taken their current camera to the limits and I guess they think if they buy a $7000 camera, it will make them better.

By they are you talking about me?? Because I surely hope you aren't.

With my plans for what I want to do in photography the cameras I want serve a purpose. Trust me I know the camera doesn't make the pictures. One of the guys I work with shot/shoots for the AP and has a 20D and 1D mk I. Both of which are not top of the line cameras by any means.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #293  
cereal83's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-08
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Spectral
By they are you talking about me?? Because I surely hope you aren't.

With my plans for what I want to do in photography the cameras I want serve a purpose. Trust me I know the camera doesn't make the pictures. One of the guys I work with shot/shoots for the AP and has a 20D and 1D mk I. Both of which are not top of the line cameras by any means.
Not talking about you at all. Just in general and even at one time I thought a better camera would take better pics.

Just in general people think the expensive toys will make them better.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:38 PM
  #294  
cruisn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-30-06
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 2
From: Onoway
Originally Posted by sick06cobalt
guys you have to realize that a large aperture is a small number and a small aperture is a large number...

for example my 85 1.8 wide open- the widest it can go is 1.8 while the smallest it can go is 22.

to get more in focus you would want a bigger number..
i know, I was only shooting on f/11 coulda cranked it up a little more
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:47 PM
  #295  
css9450's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-29-06
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 1
From: Glen Ellyn, Illinois
Originally Posted by Spectral
the D40 has to have AF-S lenses. The lens has to focus. So I have a limited amount of lenses I can chose from.
Eh, that's not such a deal breaker anymore, unless you already have a stash of older AF (not AFS) lenses or you just like picking up older lenses for cheap. They still meter fine on the D40. Its been a long time since they introduced a new lens that wasn't AFS.

I admit I have a soft spot for the D40, probably because its so tiny I could stash it in my bag as a backup, and they are dirt cheap these days. The only things keeping me from buying one are the minimum 200 ISO, the lack of autobracketing and it won't use the infrared release.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:50 PM
  #296  
Cobalt2921's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-18-06
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
From: Saint Charles, Missouri
Originally Posted by Spectral
So what do you guys use to pack all your gear in??

I've got a lowpro mini trekker AW and i love it!
Lowepro Slingshot 100 AW for me!
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 04:54 PM
  #297  
cruisn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-30-06
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 2
From: Onoway
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 05:01 PM
  #298  
sick06cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Originally Posted by BigTizzle903
I do understand that, but what I'm saying is I have my lens on auto focus, and when I find a subkect to shoot the camera tries to focus, but the image just doesn't come into focus and then it wont take the picture.
most likely because there isnt alot of contrast for the camera to pick up on it... try and give me a sample in bright day light
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 05:13 PM
  #299  
cruisn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-30-06
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 2
From: Onoway
Originally Posted by sick06cobalt
most likely because there isnt alot of contrast for the camera to pick up on it... try and give me a sample in bright day light
I found that with my xs to. I jsut turn it to manual focus and keep going
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 05:54 PM
  #300  
Spectral's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-30-06
Posts: 11,850
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, Washington
Originally Posted by css9450
Eh, that's not such a deal breaker anymore, unless you already have a stash of older AF (not AFS) lenses or you just like picking up older lenses for cheap. They still meter fine on the D40. Its been a long time since they introduced a new lens that wasn't AFS.

I admit I have a soft spot for the D40, probably because its so tiny I could stash it in my bag as a backup, and they are dirt cheap these days. The only things keeping me from buying one are the minimum 200 ISO, the lack of autobracketing and it won't use the infrared release.
Most fixed lenses aren't afs. Like I have a 50 1.8 that i have to manually focus which can be a real pain.

However I would like to let you know that you can use the wireless infared remote with the D40. I'm pretty sure that's what you meant by infared release.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 AM.