War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

Beat a 5.0!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 11:38 PM
  #101  
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-05
Posts: 13,306
Likes: 0
From: UNDER YOUR BED
Originally Posted by sick_ss/sc
yea i bet there buddy.. why dont u take ur gay slow mustang and get off this CHEVY forum??huh.. **** a mustang..lol 4 bangers beating them all day..lol

Thats cute. I would eat you alive and spit you out soo fast you wouldnt be able to tell the difference between your a##hole and the hole in your face. LOLZ @ all the s*it talk from a STOCK SS/SC.

MY COBRA > your car

Hell, MY SOLD SS/SC > your car

And dont even try arguing with me. I know more about the SS/SC than you. I have owned one and am staring at the complete build book for the LSJ engine, part numbers and all.

2006 COBALT SS/SC,,CAI,ITD,PAINTED BOWTIE,STICKERS,RED LED UNDERGLOW NICE,COLOR MATCHED PAINTED RIMS,PAINTED INTERIOR,PROJECTORS CA 3 GAUGE POD, AIR/FUEL,BOOST,OIL TEMP. LOWERED 2.5" BACK,2 1/4 FRONT,235/35/18 TIRES, AND MORE TO COME

^^^^ BAHAHAH, look at those mods. 1 power adder. Wow, everyone watch out here comes the FAST SS/SC with just a CAI, O no!

I have one phrase for you:

" All show, no go. "

Im going to apologize to any Cobalt owners other than this very "special" person above about my comments. I just cant stand RICERS, even if they own nice cars ( aka a SS/SC ).
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 11:50 PM
  #102  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
Originally Posted by kocobalt
blainestang you of course are confused. i made no comment about the potential of the mustang. the comments were in reference factory stock cars. nothing i said is disputable. and i realy don't care about your bullit. you may question my comments intent but the facts remain the same. external modification has little performance improvement. less turbo or supercharer instalation. i know how sensitive some mustang owner are. but i have not been beat by a v6 mustang or a four banger out on the street yet. and as i told you i have been at this for a long time and so i am not at all surprised that you would be builing a 4 banger. i have seen this application i a number of pony stock cars. i also have an LS1 car that needs no defending. my comment was the 2.0 ss/sc makes more hp per cubic inch than the stock naturally asperated 5.0. do you disagree with this statement? and if so how so?
so...now the argument is factory stock mustangs don't have ****? get yourself a "factory stock" camaro or trans am...ill get someone from one of the mustang forums in the same area with an 03-04 cobra...fair? bwahahah it'd be a slaughter. there are bolt on fox's in the low 13's/high 12's, so again you have no clue.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 11:53 PM
  #103  
Helltime's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-07
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
From: Des Moines, IA
I will be MORE than happy to race some of you at cordova this summer/fall with my 85GT if you want. Not because i think my car is faster than everyone on here, but because i think it would just be fun, but any of you that want to talk smack all i have to say is cordova, IL next spring
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 07:31 AM
  #104  
kocobalt's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-16-08
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: tonganoxie,ks.
no my astatement is the same. there is no magic in the mustang. and my original comment has not been discounted by anything other than opinoin. and all your tuff talk and name calling simply shows your defensiveness. at no point did i change my statement of fact. and 300 hp is what a 08 gt 4.6 is putting out. these are not make believe stories on the internet. and the cobalt should not be disrespected based simply on unrealistic build specs. when being compared to a V8 system. thats just the way mustang ranch works though. your turbo is worth about 100 hp. and yes i live in the real world and thats the way it is. try not reading so much into what you think i mean. the horse power quoted has nothing to do with your argument about how hard you can squeeze 5.0. i get the impression you think i don't respect the small block. i never even said a negative thing about mustang or the 5.0. the comparision was to a 4 cylinder motor and an 8. but as mustang owners apparently you can't see that. and so here we go again. it is not about who is better or who is faster they are what they are. and as for my exsperience i am not judged by children reguardless of how they percieve me. and ricer i don't think so.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 08:12 AM
  #105  
Helltime's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-07
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
From: Des Moines, IA
Originally Posted by kocobalt
no my astatement is the same. there is no magic in the mustang. and my original comment has not been discounted by anything other than opinoin. and all your tuff talk and name calling simply shows your defensiveness. at no point did i change my statement of fact. and 300 hp is what a 08 gt 4.6 is putting out. these are not make believe stories on the internet. and the cobalt should not be disrespected based simply on unrealistic build specs. when being compared to a V8 system. thats just the way mustang ranch works though. your turbo is worth about 100 hp. and yes i live in the real world and thats the way it is. try not reading so much into what you think i mean. the horse power quoted has nothing to do with your argument about how hard you can squeeze 5.0. i get the impression you think i don't respect the small block. i never even said a negative thing about mustang or the 5.0. the comparision was to a 4 cylinder motor and an 8. but as mustang owners apparently you can't see that. and so here we go again. it is not about who is better or who is faster they are what they are. and as for my exsperience i am not judged by children reguardless of how they percieve me. and ricer i don't think so.
ok, you wanna talk **** about mustangs here are a few things i would like to start off with:
the newer mustangs (2005+) are an embarrassment! i mean for christ sake they are slow as ****, it may be rated at 300hp but thats nowhere near enough for that bloated pos.
As for comparing v8s to 4 cylinders, i agree its pointless, so how about we take a step away from the 5.0 vs SS/SC arguement and let me put this out there, i could spend around $5-6k (including price of the car!!!) and stomp any cobalt on this site with a 2.3, see its REALLY easy to swap a 2.3t into a 4cylinder fox and put out almost 200hp with that motor being stock and around 250hp before haveing to do any major mods (turbo upgrade and so on). only 100hp for the turbo? are you nuts? the turbo foxes are way faster than the supercharged ones and the supercharged ones are getting around 100 extra hp.
as for you kocobalt, your a joke, saying 5.0s are weak? HA!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #106  
turbo86's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 11-07-07
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: BFE, KY
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 10:41 AM
  #107  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
people who compare hp/ltr have small dicks.

bring your happy ass to kansas city. there is a couple bolt on mustangs here that will be more than happy to make you their bitch.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 11:16 AM
  #108  
Blainestang's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-19-05
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by kocobalt
no my astatement is the same. there is no magic in the mustang. and my original comment has not been discounted by anything other than opinoin. and all your tuff talk and name calling simply shows your defensiveness. at no point did i change my statement of fact. and 300 hp is what a 08 gt 4.6 is putting out. these are not make believe stories on the internet. and the cobalt should not be disrespected based simply on unrealistic build specs. when being compared to a V8 system. thats just the way mustang ranch works though. your turbo is worth about 100 hp. and yes i live in the real world and thats the way it is. try not reading so much into what you think i mean. the horse power quoted has nothing to do with your argument about how hard you can squeeze 5.0. i get the impression you think i don't respect the small block. i never even said a negative thing about mustang or the 5.0. the comparision was to a 4 cylinder motor and an 8. but as mustang owners apparently you can't see that. and so here we go again. it is not about who is better or who is faster they are what they are. and as for my exsperience i am not judged by children reguardless of how they percieve me. and ricer i don't think so.
Man... you really have no clue. Not to mention, you're pretending you didn't say things that you DID say. You said that "a turbo 5.0 would do well to run 13's"... Oh really? How about the handful that went 13's, STOCK? Seriously... 13's being "good" with a turbocharged 5.0. You're clueless.

But, keep pretending like you're right and calling us children. It's funny... you act like it's the Mustang guys being defensive, but there are Cobalt guys disagreeing with you, too.

Take the hint... you made incorrect statements.

Sure, a 20-year-old N/A pushrod motor makes less hp/L than a late-model supercharged one. Yay! No one debated that. However, that point is meaninless and fanboy-ish, and many of your other statement are incorrect... and that's what EVERYONE is pointing out.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 11:26 AM
  #109  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC


You can make 300 HP with the stock blower and motor, but its going to cost ya. Ported blower, machined snout, 2.5" pulley, meth injection, 60 lb injectors + harness, Cobra H/E, tune, spark plugs, CAI, full exhaust, 100+ octane tune, and a dual pass for good measure.

Better hope piston #4 doesnt go though, that is a tendency of the SS/SC.

The LSJ can handle 300 HP, but that is getting close to its threshold. Its best to use N20 to attain that high of HP just because it is less stress on the engine overall compared to a consistant 300+ HP SC or turbo setup. Not to mention less heat soak.
you don't know much about the lsj do you.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #110  
Eddie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-11-04
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: patterson, ca
we so need a popcorn eating smiley, lol, so stayin out of this one although i want to join in.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 01:45 PM
  #111  
sick_ss/sc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-07
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: va
cakeeater **** u.. ban me bitch i dont give a ****.. ur a **********..lol..... and 1badss/sc **** u 2 buddy..

Last edited by sick_ss/sc; Apr 23, 2008 at 02:22 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 02:15 PM
  #112  
Badju587's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-09-07
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Severance, CO
Originally Posted by Eddie
we so need a popcorn eating smiley, lol, so stayin out of this one although i want to join in.
freesmileys.org dude, they have a ton.

http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/ad/popcorn.gif

Looks like this:



Have fun with your new gif's
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 02:32 PM
  #113  
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-08-06
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 410
From: Fort Worth, TX
OR SmiliesFTW.com
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 02:35 PM
  #114  
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-05
Posts: 13,306
Likes: 0
From: UNDER YOUR BED
Originally Posted by Area47
you don't know much about the lsj do you.

I hope thats sarcasm. If not, its already been done and it was one of the first Cobalts to run into the 12's. This was back when the original 1/4mi list was first created, jeesh long time ago.

Originally Posted by sick_ss/sc
cakeeater **** u.. ban me bitch i dont give a ****.. ur a **********..lol..... and 1badss/sc **** u 2 buddy..
awww. Have to resort to name calling because Im right and I would spank your a%%. Go back to your slow cobalt and cry some. Maybe if you pray to God he will make it faster

Last edited by 1BADSS/SC; Apr 23, 2008 at 02:35 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #115  
sick_ss/sc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-07
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: va
man i dont want a fast car.. cause trust me if i did i would.. i bet i get more girls and looks than ur gay ass mustang *** bag..lol.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 02:41 PM
  #116  
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-08-06
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 410
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by sick_ss/sc
man i dont want a fast car.. cause trust me if i did i would.. i bet i get more girls and looks than ur gay ass mustang *** bag..lol.
Stop acting like a little kid with the name calling and immature comments. And it may not be an 03/04... but I'll put money on a COBRA dropping panties a lot faster than a Cobalt.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 02:44 PM
  #117  
sick_ss/sc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-07
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: va
yea rite... i bet..
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 02:49 PM
  #118  
turbo86's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 11-07-07
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: BFE, KY
I've already got into a silly argument with a Mustang owner over a mondane extremely generic "non-specific platform" statment in this post.

I think it is time that the admins Close this thread. I make first motion.

No good is coming from this thread. What also blows my mind, is the amount of Mustang guys on a Cobalt forum? Why? I see that some actually own both a cobalt and a mustang, which makes sense, but a few only have a Mustang, and they are on this site.... to what purpose? I am being quite mature and serious in this quesiton. My best friend has a blown foxbody with an original 69' windsor motor that runs 6.2s in the 1/8th (street car)...so I am not biased by any stretch of the imagination.

thread needs closing...
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 02:54 PM
  #119  
sick_ss/sc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-07
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: va
agreed.... close it before it gets 2 where people wanna drive 400 miles..lol
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 03:23 PM
  #120  
Misery5567's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-19-07
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: Cheraw, SC
Man.

This sure went in the toilet.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #121  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
I hope thats sarcasm. If not, its already been done and it was one of the first Cobalts to run into the 12's. This was back when the original 1/4mi list was first created, jeesh long time ago.


yes i know who did it. there is actually an easier way to do it, and less severe degredation on the motor itself.

boost is not the answer.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 03:58 PM
  #122  
Acidangel_5.0's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-25-06
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 0
From: Dacula, Georgia
Originally Posted by kocobalt
i don't believe that a stock 5.0 with a turbo will run in the 11 sec. quarter even if it is in st. louis. a turbo 5.0 would do well to run 13's. so come on mustang guys to be talking the same old tired ford guy ****. the mustang wins the pony car class by defaut only. there is no magic in the mustang. and 300 hp is about all your gonna get. and with 2.0 and a stage 2 you get 250 hp so let's do the math which one makes the most hp per cubic inch. and anyone can site something they have seen how about what you have and drive everday.


oh **** please god tell me this kid isnt serious.. i couldnt even read past this post without laughing my ass off..

your a dipshit... stock 5.0 with SINGLE i have seen dyno over 400rwhp on about 15 psi.

monkeynuts like yourself need to visit WWW.CORRAL.NET and learn..

also.. the HP/displacement is about ******* stupid... if american companies did this you would see 500hp minivans and 800hp SUV everywhere.. there is a reason they dont push it that high..

but a 5.0 block built with toys.. i have seen dyno over 2K... now who gives a **** about hp/litre with that kinda power
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 04:04 PM
  #123  
04YellowGT's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-06
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by sick_ss/sc
man i dont want a fast car.. cause trust me if i did i would.. i bet i get more girls and looks than ur gay ass mustang *** bag..lol.
HAHA I m sure you don't and if I wanted to date a super model I would but I just don't want to.

I’m sure all the 14yo girls love your car when you cruise by the middle school. Man you're such a bad ass; I wish I could be as cool as you.

My you guess is there is a 95% chance you’re 16 and just got you license.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #124  
black06ss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-29-05
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, Florida
hell i know 2 girls that like my cobalt better than my mustang. my wife and a friends wife. my wife mostly because she didnt want me to have 2 fun cars and my friends wife because shes into the import scene.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 04:21 PM
  #125  
Bades's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-24-07
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
From: Winchester, VA
idk guys.. mos the girls i know prefer the SS SC... they say the mustangs r gud for the lil girls outside the mall.. lol.... personally if yall wanted a car to get girls i suggest a porsche... lol or u can b cool like me and buy a s2000.. lol
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 PM.