2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

FTW-k04R vs ZFR In need of turbo swap!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 04:51 PM
  #2451  
no_ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 09-28-14
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 58
From: Ft. Myers
Originally Posted by KMO43
Whats traction? Upgrade CABs run R compounds and air bag the rear you'll be fine
I probably need new CABs here soon!
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 04:55 PM
  #2452  
KMO43's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 6,884
Likes: 94
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by no_ss
I probably need new CABs here soon!
Mine will be getting installed in 2 weeks
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 06:51 PM
  #2453  
Canadia's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-07-12
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 13
From: Dartmouth
I just bought brand new never installed Powell tcabs and brand new 3bar maps for $200 from a buddy that sold his balt. Score !
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 06:51 PM
  #2454  
Snail_SS's Avatar
Moderator
Platinum Member
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-18-14
Posts: 16,423
Likes: 603
From: El Paso, TX
Nice man that's an awesome price
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 08:21 PM
  #2455  
KMO43's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 6,884
Likes: 94
From: Calgary
Ya thats good but the spherical CABs are more important
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 09:01 PM
  #2456  
Canadia's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-07-12
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 13
From: Dartmouth
Originally Posted by KMO43
Ya thats good but the spherical CABs are more important
when ur stock tcabs are shot this is important lol
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 12:14 AM
  #2457  
T-Man's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-07-09
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 89
From: The Desert
My R goes on the new ride soon.... Very soon. Really enjoying the stocker at the moment though haha

I'm going to do some before and after with it. 91 and then E on the stocker vs 91 and E on the R. Should be fun to see how much it picks up.

Already picked up 35whp with just increasing the boost and tossing the catless DP on it. Haven't touched factory timing yet
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 12:20 AM
  #2458  
T-Man's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-07-09
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 89
From: The Desert
Originally Posted by Canadia
can you not make as much tq on an R? Or are you referring to the 200rpm slower spool
I did testing with this on my previous sedan and the R setup. I was able to match my stock times from vacuum to 20lbs of boost at .71 seconds. I posted about it in this thread somewhere.

Made over 430wtq too

With what's available via HPT, you can drastically affect spool times with the PID controls and Opti spark tables. However, the upside to the R is that you can smooth the delivery and have it still make great midrange power unlike the stocker.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 06:34 AM
  #2459  
Canadia's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-07-12
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 13
From: Dartmouth
Question for anyone that's smarter than me (a lot of you) if someone went big turbo, either 67 or 71 would it be possible to achieve 400+whp but also keep the tq under 400? Say for example if someone wanted around 420whp/370wtq
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 09:00 AM
  #2460  
KMO43's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 6,884
Likes: 94
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by Canadia
Question for anyone that's smarter than me (a lot of you) if someone went big turbo, either 67 or 71 would it be possible to achieve 400+whp but also keep the tq under 400? Say for example if someone wanted around 420whp/370wtq
Yes
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 12:45 PM
  #2461  
LNFwagonSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-05-12
Posts: 700
Likes: 24
From: Omaha
Originally Posted by Canadia
Question for anyone that's smarter than me (a lot of you) if someone went big turbo, either 67 or 71 would it be possible to achieve 400+whp but also keep the tq under 400? Say for example if someone wanted around 420whp/370wtq
Absolutely NOT! You must make ALLL the torque
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 02:00 PM
  #2462  
63 Nova SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 06-12-12
Posts: 5,466
Likes: 316
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by LNFwagonSS
Absolutely NOT! You must make ALLL the torque
Yep torque makes life fun, and at the edge of control....
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 02:05 PM
  #2463  
KMO43's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 6,884
Likes: 94
From: Calgary
With a turbo like the 71 you want some torque to get the thing spooled up then you can let it eat on the topend
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2016 | 12:20 PM
  #2464  
KMO43's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 6,884
Likes: 94
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by LNFwagonSS
My fuel mixture was between E50-E55


OK here is the graph. On the bottom you can see the boost curve. This was on a DYNOmite dynamometer. It's a loaded dyno similar to a mustang dyno.



The dip you see on the top end is from tach signal wire, so ignore that. The power curve and boost curve is impressive compare to stock. Its too bad we weren't able to turn the boost up past 26.4 psi. There was probably more ponies left on the table.

The other issue is that we had to turn the timing down 4* compared to stock K04 e55 tune as it was showing a bit of KR so he turned it down to be safe. Soooo, Sry KMO but it's not always possible to run "Max timing" with low ethanol mixtures and this turbo. Bryan thinks it's entirely possible I would have made a bit more power with a 100% E85 fuel as I had plenty of fueling available with my new setup since I have the fuel lobe cam and recently added the Opel injectors during this build. The shop also had two dyno on site. The other one was a dynojet and the owner knows for a fact that the dynojet reads 12% higher than the one I was using. So for the people that only care about peak #s, if I would have been on that dyno, I would have hit 400hp. I will be going back soon with full E85 blend and more timing.

My mods are:
Stock 2.5 catback (also losing power here too)
Catless DP
Custom intake using stock MAF housing
Hot&cold side charge pipes
ZZP large IC
Fuel lobe cam
Opel injectors
7blade k04r w high boost actuator
Currently we have Colin on just under 25psi @ 23° up top and have not seen a single hint of knock running E47!
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2016 | 12:47 PM
  #2465  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by KMO43
Currently we have Colin on just under 25psi @ 23° up top and have not seen a single hint of knock running E47!
degradation of octane due to oil consumption. His wagon was getting angry with me. now I know why.

You can see it in the dyno run itself up top. ******* wavy ****!
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2016 | 01:15 PM
  #2466  
KMO43's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 6,884
Likes: 94
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by Area47
degradation of octane due to oil consumption. His wagon was getting angry with me. now I know why.

You can see it in the dyno run itself up top. ******* wavy ****!
So he's got a rebuild since? What timing are you up to now? Coins turbo drops boost where mine didn't but I also had a different actuator setup.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2016 | 04:36 PM
  #2467  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by KMO43
So he's got a rebuild since? What timing are you up to now? Coins turbo drops boost where mine didn't but I also had a different actuator setup.
the turbo **** the bed and was blowing oil into the chambers. Off the top of my head, i believe he was at 21-22 degrees.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2016 | 04:44 PM
  #2468  
KMO43's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 6,884
Likes: 94
From: Calgary
That's still pretty good timing on a turbo with such a small exhaust housing
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2016 | 02:54 PM
  #2469  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by KMO43
That's still pretty good timing on a turbo with such a small exhaust housing
It can take more, just need to get past the oil issue.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2016 | 11:46 AM
  #2470  
LNFwagonSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-05-12
Posts: 700
Likes: 24
From: Omaha
She's all better now, running solid. New trans, turbo, and engine. I'd say she'll be healthy for a while. We'll be dialing it in again.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2016 | 07:05 PM
  #2471  
T-Man's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-07-09
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 89
From: The Desert
Got the R installed on #3 and my god is this turbo loud (coming from the stocker)!

One thing I'm noticing is that the car wants to start spooling when going up hill and sits at around manifold pressure (zero vacuum). I'm wondering if this is a side effect of having too much preload on the wastegate, the "high boost" canister itself or a combination of the two?

I've tried messing with the PID tables to minimize it (OS timing is stock/stock difference) with no luck.

Any ideas?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2016 | 07:54 PM
  #2472  
Snail_SS's Avatar
Moderator
Platinum Member
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-18-14
Posts: 16,423
Likes: 603
From: El Paso, TX
My car tends to do that when going over hills but mine actually builds boost with minimal throttle and it used to do that on the stocker
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2016 | 09:34 PM
  #2473  
63 Nova SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 06-12-12
Posts: 5,466
Likes: 316
From: Indiana
I can drive mine up a hill at -10 all day and not build boost on light throttle. You guys must not be as boost ramped as mine is.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2016 | 09:41 PM
  #2474  
KMO43's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 6,884
Likes: 94
From: Calgary
Going up a hill loads the car and can spool the turbo it's totally normal has nothing to do with ramp. Ramp is % of max torque vs rpm. 1 to 5psi of light boost up a hill will have nothing to do with ramp
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 12:06 AM
  #2475  
T-Man's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-07-09
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 89
From: The Desert
Originally Posted by Snail_SS
My car tends to do that when going over hills but mine actually builds boost with minimal throttle and it used to do that on the stocker
Sounds like my theory about the "high boost" canister was right then. My stocker didn't do this.

Originally Posted by 63 Nova SS
I can drive mine up a hill at -10 all day and not build boost on light throttle. You guys must not be as boost ramped as mine is.
Again, this leads me to believe that it's the upgraded WG canister. I promise you, I have quite a bit of a torque spike reduction strategy

I do not plan to have my transmission **** the bed anytime soon.

Originally Posted by KMO43
Going up a hill loads the car and can spool the turbo it's totally normal has nothing to do with ramp. Ramp is % of max torque vs rpm. 1 to 5psi of light boost up a hill will have nothing to do with ramp
I agree with you on this.

Ultimately, I'm going to continue to tinker with the WG rod and back off the preload a bit. I truly believe it can help to make a difference because I'm still seeing 23lbs of boost (and quite quickly) with low 70% WGDC. If this doesn't work, oh well. I'll just have to chalk this up to "because race car"
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 AM.