2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

highest whp ss/t to date

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2009, 02:22 PM
  #151  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
EatonTVS07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-06
Location: KCMO
Posts: 14,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we have 92 in a couple places....
EatonTVS07 is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 02:32 PM
  #152  
Senior Member
 
revhigh18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-15-08
Location: Lee's Summit MO
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
92 in like 2 places and 93 in 1 like 20 mins from here but i could just mix 100 with 91 and we would be all good
revhigh18 is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 02:33 PM
  #153  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
EatonTVS07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-06
Location: KCMO
Posts: 14,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wheres 93?
EatonTVS07 is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 03:36 PM
  #154  
Senior Member
 
revhigh18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-15-08
Location: Lee's Summit MO
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
some where off 24 highway
revhigh18 is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 03:41 PM
  #155  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
EatonTVS07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-06
Location: KCMO
Posts: 14,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh yea brian told me about that i forgot
EatonTVS07 is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 04:06 PM
  #156  
Senior Member
 
leahciM's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-31-08
Location: North End
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Area47
naa. not competition. matt at tune time is a good cat. they also have better fuel up there than we do

No kidding? So you clearly know there is no reason to compare turbo cobalts using different dynos, different fuel, in different places/elevations/climates yet you made this thread... Seems odd since you seem so smart...

So I again question why you even made this thread. As I suggested before, it's very easy to see through the thin veil and discover you've merely created another thread to stroke your own ego. What amazes me is no one else seems to have gotten tired of all this BS.
leahciM is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 04:10 PM
  #157  
Rent me! per hour
Thread Starter
 
Area47's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by leahciM
No kidding? So you clearly know there is no reason to compare turbo cobalts using different dynos, different fuel, in different places/elevations/climates yet you made this thread... Seems odd since you seem so smart...

So I again question why you even made this thread. As I suggested before, it's very easy to see through the thin veil and discover you've merely created another thread to stroke your own ego. What amazes me is no one else seems to have gotten tired of all this BS.
i made this thread just for a number to shoot for on someones car. i hit that number and called it done. nothing more. i rarely poke around the lnf stuff unless someone is severely out of line on what they "think" they know. it wasn't an ego stroke. the owner of the car is doing that on his own with his car

::shrugs::
Area47 is offline  
Old 02-01-2009, 02:15 AM
  #158  
Former Vendor
 
Hahn RaceCraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-07-06
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Those are the uncorrected numbers. Even Bill Hahn says that those results were also due to the cold weather. The corrected numbers are most likey around 295-300 whp and 330-340 trq. "You results will vary" He even goes on to say.
Correction about Uncorrected Department: These numbers were STD, not uncorrected. The uncorrected numbers were most definitely higher still!

STD numbers are not unusual, and even used in many magazine tests.

Does this mean we win? Crazed HHR's aside *pokes Aaron*

Originally Posted by Terminator2
All Hahn's numbers are overinflated STD numbers acheived during very good cold conditions.
I take exception with the term 'all', lest readers be misinformed. It's not true. ONE set of numbers we claim was achieved in good weather conditions...not 'all' of our numbers. My policy of full disclosure is why everyone knows that we had good conditions for the run in question. Good conditions, but not outrageous...52-degree weather, while decent, is not all that unusual. Many dragstrips still operate in the 50's. Frankly, it's actually well above the 46-degree mean annual temperature for New York City (source: NOAA).

I also can't agree with the 'overinflated' description. Our STD numbers are indeed an accurate comparison, and accepted by many in the industry. We even smoothed them to take out unreasonable peaks, which is not something everyone posting dyno runs here can claim . Since our stock baselines are also taken at STD factors, our comparative before/after results are indeed quite valid.

Now, if the Rules Of This Game say that dyno numbers taken during Good Conditions are disallowed, then so be it. But the title of this thread is pretty clear!

Nonetheless, if it would please anyone, I can also post an SAE dyno chart. Smoothed, unsmoothed, you name it. BSR PPC, non-BSR PPC, whatever you folks would like, it's all pretty awesome, and well in excess of the numbers Terminator guesses at...just ask and it's here

Don't MAKE me post an actual uncorrected, unsmoothed chart and break everyone's heart with how much power we ACTUALLY made that day!
======================

DISCLAIMER: It's all in fun, Terminator I just make great parts, and that's what I sell. No matter who tunes them...our parts are a cut above the rest. I am just also fortunate enough to have the tuning capability to prove this. My intention is not to win the big johnson contest, but to give prospective customers the comfort they need, so they know that the parts we sell are indeed superior. I'm not out to be the Top Gun...just to make sure that whoever aspires to be Top Gun wants to use my parts to get there

Last edited by Hahn RaceCraft; 02-01-2009 at 10:41 AM. Reason: I just can't shut UP!
Hahn RaceCraft is offline  
Old 02-01-2009, 11:23 AM
  #159  
New Member
 
Fast HHRSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-13-08
Location: Ohio
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EcoBoost
Fast HHRSS is offline  
Old 02-01-2009, 12:56 PM
  #160  
Senior Member
 
revhigh18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-15-08
Location: Lee's Summit MO
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bill that's why I bought your **** haha
revhigh18 is offline  
Old 02-01-2009, 01:46 PM
  #161  
Senior Member
 
SUKXOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-27-06
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^ x2!* Hahn 2012!** LOL
SUKXOST is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 12:11 PM
  #162  
Senior Member
 
Psykostevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,911
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Area47
naa. not competition. matt at tune time is a good cat. they also have better fuel up there than we do
Yeah, the fuel makes a huge difference since the LNF was designed around 95 octane. Me and you have snail **** for premium.

Originally Posted by SUKXOST
^^^ x2!* Hahn 2012!** LOL
We could use another President from Illinois LOL!

Last edited by Psykostevo; 02-02-2009 at 12:11 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Psykostevo is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 12:26 PM
  #163  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
Correction about Uncorrected Department: These numbers were STD, not uncorrected. The uncorrected numbers were most definitely higher still!

STD numbers are not unusual, and even used in many magazine tests.

Does this mean we win? Crazed HHR's aside *pokes Aaron*



I take exception with the term 'all', lest readers be misinformed. It's not true. ONE set of numbers we claim was achieved in good weather conditions...not 'all' of our numbers. My policy of full disclosure is why everyone knows that we had good conditions for the run in question. Good conditions, but not outrageous...52-degree weather, while decent, is not all that unusual. Many dragstrips still operate in the 50's. Frankly, it's actually well above the 46-degree mean annual temperature for New York City (source: NOAA).

I also can't agree with the 'overinflated' description. Our STD numbers are indeed an accurate comparison, and accepted by many in the industry. We even smoothed them to take out unreasonable peaks, which is not something everyone posting dyno runs here can claim . Since our stock baselines are also taken at STD factors, our comparative before/after results are indeed quite valid.

Now, if the Rules Of This Game say that dyno numbers taken during Good Conditions are disallowed, then so be it. But the title of this thread is pretty clear!

Nonetheless, if it would please anyone, I can also post an SAE dyno chart. Smoothed, unsmoothed, you name it. BSR PPC, non-BSR PPC, whatever you folks would like, it's all pretty awesome, and well in excess of the numbers Terminator guesses at...just ask and it's here

Don't MAKE me post an actual uncorrected, unsmoothed chart and break everyone's heart with how much power we ACTUALLY made that day!
======================

DISCLAIMER: It's all in fun, Terminator I just make great parts, and that's what I sell. No matter who tunes them...our parts are a cut above the rest. I am just also fortunate enough to have the tuning capability to prove this. My intention is not to win the big johnson contest, but to give prospective customers the comfort they need, so they know that the parts we sell are indeed superior. I'm not out to be the Top Gun...just to make sure that whoever aspires to be Top Gun wants to use my parts to get there
Not knocking you at all Bill. In fact I just ordered your catted max flow DP from turbotechracing. I was simply saying that comparing numbers that are STD correction factor to SAE numbers is not apples to apples thats all. I think you do good work. BTW what were the SAE smoothed numbers on that run I am interested to know?
Terminator2 is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 12:35 PM
  #164  
Senior Member
 
lewisb13's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-30-07
Location: Home: Utica, MI Current Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by leahciM
No kidding? So you clearly know there is no reason to compare turbo cobalts using different dynos, different fuel, in different places/elevations/climates yet you made this thread... Seems odd since you seem so smart...

So I again question why you even made this thread. As I suggested before, it's very easy to see through the thin veil and discover you've merely created another thread to stroke your own ego. What amazes me is no one else seems to have gotten tired of all this BS.
Thats a pretty ballsy thing to say. Brian is very respected around here and doesnt start bullshit threads for no reason.
lewisb13 is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 01:42 PM
  #165  
Former Vendor
 
Hahn RaceCraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-07-06
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Not knocking you at all Bill. In fact I just ordered your catted max flow DP from turbotechracing. I was simply saying that comparing numbers that are STD correction factor to SAE numbers is not apples to apples thats all. I think you do good work. BTW what were the SAE smoothed numbers on that run I am interested to know?
It's all good I have to be protective at times, to present all sides, since these forum threads can be virtually perpetual...years from now, someone will see it and bring it back up to me

I am also very pleased we can be part of your buildup too

I'll post a chart showing this version of the dyno data. Thank you for being cool.

Originally Posted by Psykostevo
Yeah, the fuel makes a huge difference since the LNF was designed around 95 octane. Me and you have snail **** for premium.



We could use another President from Illinois LOL!
Hah! At the rate we're losing Illinois politicians, I'm likely to be called up soon

Last edited by Hahn RaceCraft; 02-02-2009 at 01:42 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Hahn RaceCraft is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 01:55 PM
  #166  
Senior Member
 
Psykostevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,911
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
Hah! At the rate we're losing Illinois politicians, I'm likely to be called up soon
I suppose the seat for Governor is going to be open. Would be an interesting job. It's about time we start drafting officials instead of electing them!
Psykostevo is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 04:10 PM
  #167  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
It's all good I have to be protective at times, to present all sides, since these forum threads can be virtually perpetual...years from now, someone will see it and bring it back up to me

I am also very pleased we can be part of your buildup too

I'll post a chart showing this version of the dyno data. Thank you for being cool.



Hah! At the rate we're losing Illinois politicians, I'm likely to be called up soon
Not a problem. Like I said not knocking your work at all I think you produce some of the highest quality parts for the TC. Thanks Bill

Originally Posted by Psykostevo
I suppose the seat for Governor is going to be open. Would be an interesting job. It's about time we start drafting officials instead of electing them!
. My dad is a politician here in Florida does that make me a candidate for this draft?

Last edited by Terminator2; 02-02-2009 at 04:10 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Terminator2 is offline  
Old 07-24-2015, 09:38 AM
  #168  
New Member
 
Jimmy Beilfuss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-23-15
Location: Indiana
Posts: 57
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
325 whp
368 wtq
2009 lnf 93 octane
Attached Thumbnails win_20150724_093653.jpg  
Jimmy Beilfuss is offline  
Old 07-24-2015, 09:54 AM
  #169  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CudaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-21-09
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 11,295
Received 74 Likes on 63 Posts
alittle late to the party
CudaJoe is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Jimmy Beilfuss (08-12-2015)
Old 07-24-2015, 11:29 AM
  #170  
Senior Member
 
Empty Pockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-12-07
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
replying to a 6+ year old thread lol.
Empty Pockets is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Jimmy Beilfuss (08-12-2015)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
05-28-2022 03:47 AM
riceburner
Featured Car Showcase
40
09-30-2015 03:54 PM
footballplaya3k
General Cobalt
15
09-28-2015 11:14 AM
dieGone
Complete Cars
4
09-23-2015 10:20 AM
jcalvin1126
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
3
09-11-2015 10:24 AM



Quick Reply: highest whp ss/t to date



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 AM.