2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Possible Intercooler Pump Upgrade (Pump Information)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2014 | 12:24 AM
  #101  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
he is trying this new pump you never know
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2014 | 08:15 AM
  #102  
blueLNFftw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 07-22-12
Posts: 10,359
Likes: 84
From: Florida
Originally Posted by reddragon72
Exactly. But I figured I would try and help out. Dumb idea.

Again this has all been done and my two ideas stand as proven methods in the racing world. People can either put a high speed pump on there and watch the iat2s steadily increase and never rebound or they can try and cool the water more and watch the iat2s drop and rebound quicker.

Me I am happy with what I have today but will probably add a second core in the near future.
Prove to me that the OEM pump on the SS is already the most efficient flow and I will believe you
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2014 | 06:10 PM
  #103  
TStone's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 02-21-11
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 7
From: Dayton, Ohio
There is such a simple solution right there in front of everyones face and no one seems to be able to catch it.......
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2014 | 07:41 PM
  #104  
riceburner's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: 05-18-11
Posts: 39,564
Likes: 87
From: West Chicago, IL
Make sure everything works right and is routed correct?

I still think this pump upgrade would be necessary for those with bigger/more heat exchangers since theres more coolant to move now
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 08:12 AM
  #105  
blueLNFftw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 07-22-12
Posts: 10,359
Likes: 84
From: Florida
Originally Posted by TStone
There is such a simple solution right there in front of everyones face and no one seems to be able to catch it.......
Then why don't you go ahead and spell it out?
And if it is "make sure everything is routed right and the pump works" then take it somewhere else. I am tired of hearing that line because obviously I did all of that; I am not a complete moron when it comes to cars. Also, if anyone wants to come check it out, drive me car, and see first hand the temps they can whenever they would like.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 08:17 AM
  #106  
blueLNFftw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 07-22-12
Posts: 10,359
Likes: 84
From: Florida
Also, I was looking over some install diagrams and realized that I have my pump installed between my secondary heat exchanger and the endplate; could this be an issue?

Mine goes pump > endplate inlet (bottom port) > endplate outlet (top port: option B is "T" in immediately after the endplate outlet) > stock HE > FMHE > back to the pump
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 08:37 AM
  #107  
Gr8Bndimi's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-17-13
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Rockford IL.
Marked for later
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 08:54 AM
  #108  
Spawne32's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-24-08
Posts: 2,664
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by BlackSSstg2
Also, I was looking over some install diagrams and realized that I have my pump installed between my secondary heat exchanger and the endplate; could this be an issue?

Mine goes pump > endplate inlet (bottom port) > endplate outlet (top port: option B is "T" in immediately after the endplate outlet) > stock HE > FMHE > back to the pump
Why does everyone seem to think that stacking heat exchangers inbetween your ac condenser and your radiator is beneficial to the intercooling system. lol For every piece you put in front of another you wind up making the one behind it that much hotter. You would probably be better off running one griffin heat exchanger on the stock pump. But thats just me.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 09:59 AM
  #109  
JapEatr's Avatar
South Central *********
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: 05-14-05
Posts: 6,148
Likes: 48
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Spawne32
Why does everyone seem to think that stacking heat exchangers inbetween your ac condenser and your radiator is beneficial to the intercooling system. lol For every piece you put in front of another you wind up making the one behind it that much hotter. You would probably be better off running one griffin heat exchanger on the stock pump. But thats just me.
Ding ding ding... That and improvements to the manifold could be had.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 10:46 AM
  #110  
reddragon72's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-24-12
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Conroe area
Originally Posted by BlackSSstg2
Also, I was looking over some install diagrams and realized that I have my pump installed between my secondary heat exchanger and the endplate; could this be an issue?

Mine goes pump > endplate inlet (bottom port) > endplate outlet (top port: option B is "T" in immediately after the endplate outlet) > stock HE > FMHE > back to the pump
a few Q's. dual pass? if so did you swap the cores around? and secondary exhanger by whom?

Originally Posted by Spawne32
Why does everyone seem to think that stacking heat exchangers inbetween your ac condenser and your radiator is beneficial to the intercooling system. lol For every piece you put in front of another you wind up making the one behind it that much hotter. You would probably be better off running one griffin heat exchanger on the stock pump. But thats just me.
That is why I said to for the output from the intake cooling cores should go into the rear exhanger first then route to the most front exhanger. This way the hottest water is cooled behind the other exhangers first and dropping the most heat.

I would also like to point out that the Griffin actually holds more water. Which has been my point all along.

And for those that missed it bigger pumps have already been tested. The "restrictive" nature of the Laminova cores dictates the water flow. An article was linked a few pages back where ZZP or OTTP tried several pumps and found that the stock Bosch pump seems to be the best suited. They even stated that once the pump was put into the system the water flow was decreased in half; again due to the restrictiveness of the Laminova cores.

The only way to cool better is to have more fluid in the system so it can cool down and not succumb to a stagnant temp. Pumping the water faster will not allow the water to cool down as it passes through the exhanger and will not allow it to "soak" up the heat from the cores.

I just wish people could understand that. you need cooler water before faster water or the whole thing becomes stagnant and useless.

Last edited by reddragon72; Sep 3, 2014 at 10:53 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 11:26 AM
  #111  
blueLNFftw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 07-22-12
Posts: 10,359
Likes: 84
From: Florida
ZZP didn't test this pump because it wasn't being made at the time. The other high flow pumps they tests had a lower head pressure than this one and all of them ended up flowing LESS than the stock one. This one flows more because it has a higher head pressure. Stock flows 4.5 restricted and this one flows 5.5gpm.
I repeat, the other options tested flowed less under restriction.

A secondary exchanger holds more water.

No, I do not have a dual pass.

Hottest fluid hits the OEM first and the FMHE second, then hits the pump and then back into the laminovas.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 11:43 AM
  #112  
reddragon72's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-24-12
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Conroe area
Originally Posted by BlackSSstg2
ZZP didn't test this pump because it wasn't being made at the time. The other high flow pumps they tests had a lower head pressure than this one and all of them ended up flowing LESS than the stock one. This one flows more because it has a higher head pressure. Stock flows 4.5 restricted and this one flows 5.5gpm.
I repeat, the other options tested flowed less under restriction.

A secondary exchanger holds more water.

No, I do not have a dual pass.

Hottest fluid hits the OEM first and the FMHE second, then hits the pump and then back into the laminovas.
Since you have two cores, which is what I have been saying, a faster pump, if it does pump faster, may help since you have more cooling surface and more water.

That setup is fine. Ensure that the pump is indeed wired correctly or it will not pump, which I am sure you have.

Also note the pump should have remained hooked up to the laminovas as it came from the factory. The pump should be drawing the hot water out(I think).

Last edited by reddragon72; Sep 3, 2014 at 11:55 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 12:14 PM
  #113  
blueLNFftw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 07-22-12
Posts: 10,359
Likes: 84
From: Florida
I think you are right on the drawing the hot water out; I may have switched it around when I did my install. Hmmmm.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 01:36 PM
  #114  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by TStone
There is such a simple solution right there in front of everyones face and no one seems to be able to catch it.......
Turbo swap, naturally.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 01:45 PM
  #115  
reddragon72's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-24-12
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Conroe area
Originally Posted by BlackSSstg2
I think you are right on the drawing the hot water out; I may have switched it around when I did my install. Hmmmm.
The pump pulls the water in from the end and spits it out the side if I remember rightly.

Also remember that the laminovas can flow both ways but one way is "better" than the other. I believe it should flow into the closed end and out the open.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 01:49 PM
  #116  
blueLNFftw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 07-22-12
Posts: 10,359
Likes: 84
From: Florida
Originally Posted by reddragon72
The pump pulls the water in from the end and spits it out the side if I remember rightly.

Also remember that the laminovas can flow both ways but one way is "better" than the other.
That part is correct with your assumption. My pump is in correctly, I just have hoses routed that it is pushing the fluid into the bottom port of the endplate after is has passed all of the exchangers.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 05:18 PM
  #117  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
I have talked to Richard at lamiflow a few times over the years and the one thing he has always said was that the manifold on our cars was excellent and that gm spent a ton of money having It designed. he has also said that the pump was an excellent choice for our setup. he said the main problem was we never got enough radiator for the system or capacity. the problem is the water gets hot and keeps getting hot from lack of volume and radiator. he also noted that a bigger pump would not pull more btu out of the air this is the setup he has recommended to me

A 2 to 5 gallon cell in the front pass floor board or trunk and a quality heat exchanger bigger then the griffen
and use another stock pump to push the water to the pump up front if using a aux tank

the hot water will come out of the manifold to the heat exchanger out of the heat exchanger to the tank out of the tank to the manifold

capacity is what will help with temps and ive been saying this for years now can you mod the blower to help cool the blower yup you sure can stegmier can mod the snout to reduce over all blower temps you can also port the lam core opening in the manifold to help reduce heat from the stacking of air

Last edited by mrbelvedere; Sep 3, 2014 at 07:33 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 06:02 PM
  #118  
riceburner's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: 05-18-11
Posts: 39,564
Likes: 87
From: West Chicago, IL
This wouldnt be a bad time or thread for someone to clarify the exact routing a dual pass setup needs to follow. Lol. Wouldnt hurt for me to double check my routing because im tired of seeing 50°+ above ambient iat2s while cruising
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 07:31 PM
  #119  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Name:  20140903_192833_zpsh65u948b.jpg
Views: 389
Size:  44.6 KB
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 10:49 PM
  #120  
yellowsupercharged06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-15-10
Posts: 5,101
Likes: 29
From: Long Island NY
Adam your better than this
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2014 | 06:44 AM
  #121  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
You're





Reply
Old Sep 4, 2014 | 02:21 PM
  #122  
reddragon72's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-24-12
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Conroe area
Helping out with the pic.

Name:  Slide1.jpg
Views: 706
Size:  76.9 KB

Why not use a standard heat exchanger(radiator)? Pull a nice one from the junk yard clean it up and you'll have a much larger surface area.

Also I don't see why we cannot create a reservoir under the hood to the left of the engine. If you moves a few things around then you could squeeze a couple gallon one in there.

OR you could use the windshield washer container! swap that one and the option B tanks around lol.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2014 | 02:30 PM
  #123  
blueLNFftw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 07-22-12
Posts: 10,359
Likes: 84
From: Florida
The reason the Option B tank is where it is is because it has to be mounted high in the system.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2014 | 04:39 PM
  #124  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
I would rather have the tank in the trunk away from radiant engine temps
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2014 | 05:02 PM
  #125  
reddragon72's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-24-12
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Conroe area
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
I would rather have the tank in the trunk away from radiant engine temps
Mount it inside the passenger fender.

Placing it in the trunk wont help much since the path to get up the front will be close to the hot pavement and will run by the engine anyways. Also you are taking a chance at the hose being hit by road debris especially since they have to be a wider tube.

Remember when adding more fluid in the system you are producing more "product weight" to push around and more surface force for the liquid to travel.

I think keeping it closer to the rest of the system would have more benefits.

Side note real quick....
Also found out from someone who knows their stuff that the original fan temp was set to 220 degrees for the SC version is due to the hot air being blown around when setting in traffic for a few min. That hot air is now being sucked into the intake.

He said to tell your tuner to set it to 210 if 220 bothers you. He said the engine temp will recover quickly and not be an issue but once the intake, especially the SC, heats up it's all over and the heat soaking will come sooner.

This is not an issue for the Turbo since the fan will inherently cool the air as it flows through the air intake system.

Take that with a grain of salt but I think he is correct. There is no cooling of the SC at all and if you take the 220 degree water in the radiator or even 197 and start blowing it around it will get sucked into the intake heating the SC up. I know the fan turns on with the AC but that is why stage three has the AC disabled. The SC is already turning faster and generating heat before it even starts to compress the air.

Lots of little things here and there to help but man am I really thinking about a second radiator(exchanger) and a reservoir.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 AM.