2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

ZZP S1 Cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:10 AM
  #101  
Vander Nars's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-12-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 3
From: Augusta GA
Originally Posted by armcclure
That was as of the writing of the article. That is no longer the case. Do some research before you pop off again.

I guess I should know by know that your opinions must be more accurate than a lab test. Show me a completely stock motor dyno peaking at 6500+
Oh wait, they don't.

Don't you have something better to do than push your ignorance onto others? All you do is stir the **** in every thread you enter.
You must be stupid I said it peaks at 6400 - 6500 that is not 6500+ but Ill be glad to prove you wrong.
Completely Stock
Name:  1stDynoStock.jpg
Views: 45
Size:  107.3 KB
Stock expect for downpipe


Both of these peak at 6400, keep trying lil girl.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:12 AM
  #102  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
my s2 peaked at 6800 but that is on the ported saab head, which is roughly the same as a stock lsj. not exactly though, so its not a direct comparison.

Originally Posted by Vander Nars
You must be stupid I said it peaks at 6400 - 6500 that is not 6500+ but Ill be glad to prove you wrong.
Completely Stock

Stock expect for downpipe


Both of these peak at 6400, keep trying lil girl.
where's the proof that's a bone stock car?

Last edited by armcclure; May 3, 2013 at 11:12 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:13 AM
  #103  
Vander Nars's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-12-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 3
From: Augusta GA
Originally Posted by armcclure
my s2 peaked at 6800 but that is on the ported saab head, which is roughly the same as a stock lsj. not exactly though, so its not a direct comparison.



where's the proof that's a bone stock car?
Its in the dyno section approved by staged07ss trying doing lil research before you pop off at the mouth.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:14 AM
  #104  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
oh I didn't pop off. just asked where the proof was. thanks.


also you're trying to compare an engine dyno to a chassis dyno... all aboard captain vander's failboat.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:18 AM
  #105  
Vander Nars's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-12-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 3
From: Augusta GA
Originally Posted by armcclure
oh I didn't pop off. just asked where the proof was. thanks.


also you're trying to compare an engine dyno to a chassis dyno... all aboard captain vander's failboat.
You can keep trying but you dont have a chance, unlike you I make sure my info is correct before I go post it. All you have provided was an inaccurate dyno session and iv proved that peak power is around 6.4 for a stock lsj.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:20 AM
  #106  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
You can keep trying but you dont have a chance, unlike you I make sure my info is correct before I go post it. All you have provided was an inaccurate dyno session and iv proved that peak power is around 6.4 for a stock lsj.
that's funny, because first graph you posted isn't a stock car. seriously, do you even pay attention to what you type?
can't even complete your own tasks
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:21 AM
  #107  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Let's get back on topic....

Back to talking about aftermarket cams for Yelcal7.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:29 AM
  #108  
Vander Nars's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-12-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 3
From: Augusta GA
Originally Posted by armcclure
that's funny, because first graph you posted isn't a stock car. seriously, do you even pay attention to what you type?
can't even complete your own tasks
You're really reaching at this point, yes the first dyno is stock and the second one is only a downpipe. Really go read the dyno section before you post in here again atleast try to be educated.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:30 AM
  #109  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by Staged07SS
Let's get back on topic....

Back to talking about aftermarket cams for Yelcal7.
i'm just waiting for him to ask another question. anyway, I was just reading an article the other day about how switching from an eddy current to inertia shifted peak hp over 400rpm... food for thought.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:31 AM
  #110  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
You're really reaching at this point, yes the first dyno is stock and the second one is only a downpipe. Really go read the dyno section before you post in here again atleast try to be educated.
smh.. well an aftermarket dp isn't stock now is it? ive already been all over the dyno thread. I like seeing my name up there. it reminds me how fun it is being good.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:34 AM
  #111  
Vander Nars's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-12-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 3
From: Augusta GA
Originally Posted by armcclure
smh.. well an aftermarket dp isn't stock now is it? ive already been all over the dyno thread. I like seeing my name up there. it reminds me how fun it is being good.
I love how you keep trying to discredit me, I clearly stated second dyno had a downpipe and that didnt effect the peak whp, as the peak whp is in the same place on the stock dyno. Like I said do some reading before posting.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:37 AM
  #112  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
I love how you keep trying to discredit me, I clearly stated second dyno had a downpipe and that didnt effect the peak whp, as the peak whp is in the same place on the stock dyno. Like I said do some reading before posting.
yet you still can't comprehend the fact that an engine dyno is completely different than a chassis dyno, which have a ton of variation amongst themselves...
comprehension>you
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:40 AM
  #113  
Vander Nars's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-12-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 3
From: Augusta GA
Originally Posted by armcclure
yet you still can't comprehend the fact that an engine dyno is completely different than a chassis dyno, which have a ton of variation amongst themselves...
comprehension>you
lol im sorry you failed to prove your point but next time do some research and you may fair a lil better. k thx bye!
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:40 AM
  #114  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Last chance. Get back on track people.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:42 AM
  #115  
jonathan923's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-07-09
Posts: 7,851
Likes: 1
From: Queens, NY
what a mess...
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:49 AM
  #116  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
lol im sorry you failed to prove your point but next time do some research and you may fair a lil better. k thx bye!
I can't force you to understand something obviously far beyond your comprehension level...



OP, my .02; go with the stage2 cams. they are very good for what they are. They offer a nice gain, and are advertised drop in ready, which they are. Judging by your thoughts and questions I think they'll make a nice fit for you.



additional food for thought;

im sure most of you have read the 300hp build book. anyone remember how much they had to adjust the bates cam gears to make up for the cams being off?
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:52 AM
  #117  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by armcclure
I can't force you to understand something obviously far beyond your comprehension level...



OP, my .02; go with the stage2 cams. they are very good for what they are. They offer a nice gain, and are advertised drop in ready, which they are. Judging by your thoughts and questions I think they'll make a nice fit for you.



additional food for thought;

im sure most of you have read the 300hp build book. anyone remember how much they had to adjust the bates cam gears to make up for the cams being off?
The build book used to scare me in terms of setting up cams.

Once ZZP came out with their drop in ready cams, I was excited. They really made everything much easier for us. Good stuff.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 11:56 AM
  #118  
Vander Nars's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-12-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 3
From: Augusta GA
Originally Posted by armcclure
I can't force you to understand something obviously far beyond your comprehension level...
lol didnt staged07ss said to let it drop, stop acting like a girl and just let it go man.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:08 PM
  #119  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
lol didnt staged07ss said to let it drop, stop acting like a girl and just let it go man.
Wow if that's not the pot calling the kettle black idk what is...

And I've been staying remotely on topic. It's cam related. I'm trying to help you.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:10 PM
  #120  
Blairwolf's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-14-11
Posts: 414
Likes: 3
From: Cutler, ME
Originally Posted by YelCal7
Here's the link that ^ He just post HotRod Ecotec used that Comp Extreme Cams.
113200 - Cast core version Hydraulic Roller Camshafts
But MrB got much more than that! Hey Yo MrB, When You gonna do Yours ?
The specs from the link you posted are the same specs that are on my zzp stage 2 cams spec card. Looks like they are the same cams. Someone correct me if I got this one wrong.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:12 PM
  #121  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by Blairwolf
The specs from the link you posted are the same specs that are on my zzp stage 2 cams spec card. Looks like they are the same cams. Someone correct me if I got this one wrong.
Yeah, when I read that article a while back I noticed they were close if not the same as the ZZP S2 cams.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:26 PM
  #122  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by Staged07SS
Yeah, when I read that article a while back I noticed they were close if not the same as the ZZP S2 cams.
And notice what zzp claims they will do vs comp...
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:39 PM
  #123  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
Stock cams
"the engine generated 229.5 hp at 5,900 rpm"
Custom cams
"The peak power point jumped by 700 rpm to 6,600 rpm, where the new cams generated 265.2 hp"

It seems they are using crank hp and they didnt even take the lsj to redline for the first dyno run so its invalid info. iv seen stock dyno sheets that show peak power on the lsj at around 6400-6500 so its around 500ish rpm short of making its peak power.
the stock valve springs were the limiting factor but regardless of pulling the stock engine to redline the cams used showed a good power increase over stock and that was the point


Originally Posted by armcclure
Not custom cams. Reading>you. Off the shelf blower grind. Only thing "custom" was they were ground on lsj blanks instead of l61.
The whole point, anyway, is that a 40+HP gain from cams is completely reasonable, especially on a setup that has much more air to expell (ie-small pulley).
A grind like mrB's is going to have a huge gain.
they used l61 intake cam blanks to grind the cams for the lsj stock and aftermarket

Originally Posted by Vander Nars
Are you stupid? Quote from the very article you linked.

"The listed catalog part number is intended for most normally aspirated Ecotecs that use dissimilar-length cams, and won't fit the LSJ head, so as of this writing, the LSJ version is a custom-order part."

You also didnt address the fact that they didnt take the car to redline on stock cams, the whole thing is inaccurate since they didnt do the test correct to start with.
you are right and wrong the unequal length cams will work in the lsj head but you will not have a cam sensor and you need to plug a couple oil feed holes and that is the setup gm used in the race engines

as for the grind they used as long as the lsa was 110 or above it would work fine
as for the testing it was done correct have you thought why they stopped at 5900 maybe that's were the the cams fell off on the stock tune due to lack of injector and the tune so why keep beating a dead horse
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:39 PM
  #124  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by Staged07SS
The build book used to scare me in terms of setting up cams.

Once ZZP came out with their drop in ready cams, I was excited. They really made everything much easier for us. Good stuff.
Btw the correct answer was zero. Comp has the lsj figured out now. Have for a long time. It's just not advertised.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:42 PM
  #125  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere

they used l61 intake cam blanks to grind the cams for the lsj stock and aftermarket
Yes, I know, I was trying to keep from confusing him further. L61 intake blanks "are" our lsj blanks.

Nice to see you chime in. Don't yell at me.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 PM.