Hmmm... true.

 

any reason you did not take it to 8

 

so you might as well say your gunna need 79lbs to work with this cause if its at 74% IDC then 60s are gunna be way high. So its safe to say 79lbs are going to be needed with this supercharger

 

Those are 79lb/hr injectors installed.[/QUOTE]

dam so the 60's will be close to being maxxed out even with the 3.34pulley

 

Just means its that much faster

 

exactly

 

witt what kinda power will you be putting down ?

 

witt how much boost are you seeing?

 

looks to be about 15 psi

more than his 2.8 setup

 

Other runs I did take it to 8k but was recieving knock due to the cooler IAT2 and stupid me still had the IAT spark adder still enabled from the dyno runs. I figured most people using the 3.34" pulley will be stock engines and won't be running any higher than 7k anyway.

 

true nice job buddy

 

About a 1.3psi increase over the stock blower and 2.8" pulley if you do the math from that MAP value above. 15.3 stock blower vs 16.6 with the TVS.

 

How does it feel vs the 2.8 setup?

 

About the same. I can't feel the 1-2psi difference.

 

Hmm..

 

but those of us with gm stage 2 will feel a big difference

 

2.75" you might feel a difference

 

Probably. No idea what the actual power to the wheels is yet. It could have higher or lower parasitic loss, the thermal efficiency difference, etc.

Yeah, from what you are telling me, it'll probably be out of the ballpark for most. I'm going to hate having to install a custom MAF housing and still haven't decided on the route I want to go with fuel yet.

 

don't redline it thats all i can say

 

u might wanna go the same route as me then...ls2 maf with a return style fuel system

 

a ls2 maf doesnt change anything besides the size of the pipe the maf sensor is in. just get a 3 inch intake

 

its frequency is higher..and i have the same intake as ur brother

 

Eh, bigger MAF housing would do the same, no guarantee if the LS2 MAF would give me the overhead needed.

I'm debating on return style or using a returnless electronic fuel pressure regulator with the supplemental pump I have.

 

raven ....ya its frequency will lower but thats only becuase its in a bigger pipe, the stock maf in a 85mm housing will give the same readings

witt i would go with a return style with a walbro in tank

 

Eh, its a pain in the ass to get the fuel sending unit to work with an aftermarket pump. I thought I found one or two that would be the stock height but I'm not 100% sure yet.