ADVANCED Performance Modifications For advanced modification topics only.

OFFICIAL Blown 4-banger build updates!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2008 | 03:37 AM
  #1026  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally Posted by Asphalt Assault
Hmm. no usable power under 3500RPM and turbo is old school thought my friend. 2871 Garrett turbo on an LSJ SS with bad tune, 12 PSI, and GMS2 tune with injectors out pulled my LSJ GMS2 3" pulley by 2.5 car lengths. plus he had to shift prior to 6200 RPM cause the injectors were maxed. car is just sick and boost is there in an instant.

when trying to crank up the boost a little he hit 20 PSI by accident. it was instant as well. I would not have believed it with out seeing it myself.

TVS is a good idea. but you can benefit from a good turbo and still have instant boost. I am still a fan of SC scream.

I know your not about TUrbo's but I didnt want you to just run your mouth about turbo lag when there is not any.

Not possible my friend. A turbo simply can not go from unspooled to fully spooled "instantly". Its physically impossible, and I know your exagurating, because the turbo M3 I tuned was stroked to 3.2L and had a TINY turbo, and even that hitting it at 4000 rpm full boost was there a fraction of a second after my foot hit the floor, then it was gone by 5500 rpm. Either way, after riding in my friends Evo X with intake, and seeing him floor it at like 2600 rpm and get like 2 psi and just sit there slowly building boost, that was the final nail in the coffin for me EVER getting a turbo. **** that ****. Turbos are too transient, they either have lag in the extreme low end, or die off in the top end. Superchargers, are there at all rpms and don't die in the top end. Yeah they draw power to work.... so does an A/C compressor, people don't bitch about that! Either way, turbos definitely have their place, I love turbos... on the right car. Also, I can not condone putting a turbo on a car called Cobalt SS SUPERCHARGED. If it was an N/A car (more than 2.5L) I would probably actually put a turbo on it instead of a supercharger. Only if it wasn't my daily driver.

However this is a thread about my build. My build meaning my car, how I'm building, and progress. So if your trying to turn this into a turbo vs. sc thread, GTFO and do it elsewhere Also don't say I'm under educated, because I've done much more research on turbo dynamics, sizing, theory, and other misc turbo bullshit, than you think.
Old May 23, 2008 | 04:32 AM
  #1027  
RedGoat's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-23-08
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: Jonestown
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
Not possible my friend. A turbo simply can not go from unspooled to fully spooled "instantly". Its physically impossible, and I know your exagurating, because the turbo M3 I tuned was stroked to 3.2L and had a TINY turbo, and even that hitting it at 4000 rpm full boost was there a fraction of a second after my foot hit the floor, then it was gone by 5500 rpm. Either way, after riding in my friends Evo X with intake, and seeing him floor it at like 2600 rpm and get like 2 psi and just sit there slowly building boost, that was the final nail in the coffin for me EVER getting a turbo. **** that ****. Turbos are too transient, they either have lag in the extreme low end, or die off in the top end. Superchargers, are there at all rpms and don't die in the top end. Yeah they draw power to work.... so does an A/C compressor, people don't bitch about that! Either way, turbos definitely have their place, I love turbos... on the right car. Also, I can not condone putting a turbo on a car called Cobalt SS SUPERCHARGED. If it was an N/A car (more than 2.5L) I would probably actually put a turbo on it instead of a supercharger. Only if it wasn't my daily driver.

However this is a thread about my build. My build meaning my car, how I'm building, and progress. So if your trying to turn this into a turbo vs. sc thread, GTFO and do it elsewhere Also don't say I'm under educated, because I've done much more research on turbo dynamics, sizing, theory, and other misc turbo bullshit, than you think.




Old May 23, 2008 | 04:49 AM
  #1028  
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-08-06
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 410
From: Fort Worth, TX
Good Stuff, Blown.

The only thing keeping me off the road is that I seem to have misplaced my front Trans Mount.

And now I need to rewire all my gauges. Even though the stock boost gauge turned off with the key... the power source, evidentially, doesn't. That's why I hate wiring **** up. I have no clue as to what I am doing.
Old May 23, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #1029  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
Ok little guy, calm down

You shall see, and I will accept your apology when the time comes



.475" lift/224 @ .050"/110 LSA (will play with it a little with the cam gears). Thats with +1 mm valves, and ridiculous head work.
yep, i will be waiting. Still won't be putting down as much as me though
Old May 23, 2008 | 05:28 PM
  #1030  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally Posted by lsjwannabe
yep, i will be waiting. Still won't be putting down as much as me though
I don't know about that mang. I don't even think your motor would handle 480 whp with out exploding. Your still on stock internals IIRC.
Old May 27, 2008 | 08:58 PM
  #1031  
SwizzDSMSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-01-05
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
From: Maine
A turbo cant spool or unspool but you can hit 20 psi if your wastegate gets stuck closed and doesnt bleed of the boost. It happens.
Old May 27, 2008 | 11:29 PM
  #1032  
KillerBee's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-23-07
Posts: 14,118
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
this damn car done yet
Old May 28, 2008 | 08:41 AM
  #1033  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Soon. All the parts will be frozen by the end of this week (hopefully). Then the head goes to the machine shop. When it comes back, its motor installation time
Old May 28, 2008 | 09:57 AM
  #1034  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
I don't know about that mang. I don't even think your motor would handle 480 whp with out exploding. Your still on stock internals IIRC.
I was talking on the 2.9 on pump
Old May 28, 2008 | 07:47 PM
  #1035  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally Posted by lsjwannabe
I was talking on the 2.9 on pump
I don't know. Your stock motor with TVS against my built motor with stock ported blower should be pretty even. My goal is roughly 335 whp on pump gas with a 2.9" pulley. Either way, AZ pump gas is spittoon juice 91 octane, compared to back east pump which is high quality 93 octane. I deserve a handicap in the competition!!!
Old May 28, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #1036  
jimbos'ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-09-05
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
From: Killeen,TX
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
I don't know. Your stock motor with TVS against my built motor with stock ported blower should be pretty even. My goal is roughly 335 whp on pump gas with a 2.9" pulley. Either way, AZ pump gas is spittoon juice 91 octane, compared to back east pump which is high quality 93 octane. I deserve a handicap in the competition!!!
you aint kidding we get the same crap 91 out here in cali
Old May 28, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #1037  
victory_red_SS's Avatar
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by jimbos'ss
you aint kidding we get the same crap 91 out here in cali
Why so low????
We have 87, 91, 93 and 94 here at the pumps.
Old May 28, 2008 | 09:02 PM
  #1038  
jimbos'ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-09-05
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
From: Killeen,TX
Originally Posted by victory_red_SS
Why so low????
We have 87, 91, 93 and 94 here at the pumps.
cuz california sucks
Old May 28, 2008 | 10:02 PM
  #1039  
nonebaltowner's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Because like EVERYTHING in california it prolly causes cancer, haha, has anyone else noticed there are so many products that have that warning on it about cali.?
Old May 29, 2008 | 05:18 AM
  #1040  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally Posted by victory_red_SS
Why so low????
We have 87, 91, 93 and 94 here at the pumps.
Originally Posted by jimbos'ss
cuz california sucks
The whole western part of the US has shitty gas. It ******* sucks, knowing that people back east are pay the same price we pay, only they are getting a MUCH MUCH better quality product. Thats why its had to compare an AZ pump gas car, with a NY pump gas car. Its a high performance car running on horrible 91 octane, vs a high performance car running on Sunoco 94 octane, practically mild race gas
Old May 29, 2008 | 11:59 AM
  #1041  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
I don't know. Your stock motor with TVS against my built motor with stock ported blower should be pretty even. My goal is roughly 335 whp on pump gas with a 2.9" pulley. Either way, AZ pump gas is spittoon juice 91 octane, compared to back east pump which is high quality 93 octane. I deserve a handicap in the competition!!!
it won't be even, look at the facts your blower is going to spit out 624 cfm at 8200 rpms, i will do 792 cfm at 7200. My ae will be 65%, yours will be in the 30% range if that. You have everything done for the car you just need a more efficent compressor plain and simple. On pump your going to be lucky to get 15* timing out of the car unless you are running meth, which i don't believe you are. Im not being a dick im just being realistic.
Old May 29, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #1042  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally Posted by lsjwannabe
it won't be even, look at the facts your blower is going to spit out 624 cfm at 8200 rpms, i will do 792 cfm at 7200. My ae will be 65%, yours will be in the 30% range if that. You have everything done for the car you just need a more efficent compressor plain and simple. On pump your going to be lucky to get 15* timing out of the car unless you are running meth, which i don't believe you are. Im not being a dick im just being realistic.
Thats funny, because that would mean it would be WORSE than it was before. Before I was running a 2.6" pulley, making ~19 psi. I had just about every intercooler mod you can imagine. For my pump gas tune at the track I ran 18* degrees of timing (at the end of the run, my IAT2 would be ~125*), and I trapped 107.1 mph with that tune. I would never see a single degree of knock through the whole run. For pump gas and roll racing I ran 15 degrees of timing due to prolonged WOT and more heat. Once again, I would see no knock what so ever, all the way until I let off at 140-150 mph and my IAT2 would be 170+. Now, that was spinning the **** out of the blower, and running 19 psi boost. So you mean to tell me, NOW that I'm spinning the blower slower, and running only ~12-13 psi, it will knock WORSE than before?!?! I'm not understanding your logic

*EDIT* Compressor efficiency aside, you failed to mention how my engine will be VASTLY more efficient at moving air than yours will
Old May 29, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #1043  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
and then your egt's were enough to light the earth on fire.
Old May 29, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #1044  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
Yet another cause of global warming found.
Old May 29, 2008 | 06:38 PM
  #1045  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by XM15
Yet another cause of global warming found.
don't let the epa here you. they will contact opec and raise the cost of crude some more.
Old May 29, 2008 | 06:39 PM
  #1046  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
I'll whisper next time. lol
Old May 29, 2008 | 06:47 PM
  #1047  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Old May 29, 2008 | 06:52 PM
  #1048  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
lol.
and btw, we don't have 94 in ny anymore... only 93 octane.... blows
Old May 29, 2008 | 07:55 PM
  #1049  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally Posted by 06blackg85ss
lol.
and btw, we don't have 94 in ny anymore... only 93 octane.... blows
Oh quit your bitchin
Old May 30, 2008 | 12:39 AM
  #1050  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
Thats funny, because that would mean it would be WORSE than it was before. Before I was running a 2.6" pulley, making ~19 psi. I had just about every intercooler mod you can imagine. For my pump gas tune at the track I ran 18* degrees of timing (at the end of the run, my IAT2 would be ~125*), and I trapped 107.1 mph with that tune. I would never see a single degree of knock through the whole run. For pump gas and roll racing I ran 15 degrees of timing due to prolonged WOT and more heat. Once again, I would see no knock what so ever, all the way until I let off at 140-150 mph and my IAT2 would be 170+. Now, that was spinning the **** out of the blower, and running 19 psi boost. So you mean to tell me, NOW that I'm spinning the blower slower, and running only ~12-13 psi, it will knock WORSE than before?!?! I'm not understanding your logic

*EDIT* Compressor efficiency aside, you failed to mention how my engine will be VASTLY more efficient at moving air than yours will
if your redline was 7400 on the 2.6 you are spinning it almost the same rpm ( withing 100) as the 2.9 at 8200.

No doubt your engine will move it better but whats the point when you don't have enough going to it .



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 PM.