You and all your bashing buddies are so smart, figure it out.




And what does that tell you? You ******* idiots are keep posting evidence as to how Choko made his #s and are too ******* retarded to even figure it out. This is too funny! What's even funnier is that Choko is soon going to be making $$ off a lot of you fools and won't even realize it.

 

umm.....you dynoed at elevation.....
you ran at elevation....
so you still ran a 14.0 with 307tq

 

Yup, you are just a troll. If you actually knew you would post up.

 

This Briliant, reading comprehension specialist, failed to realize the SAE-correction factor as stated on teh origonal dyno chart? How can it be!! Hey dummy! SAE correction factor weigh for elevation and correct it to sea level #'s!

 

so wheres the uncorrected numbers then.
id like to see what fluffy correction factor was used.

 

Choko posted the shop's contact information. Why don't you call and ask then them yourself, If i post it you'll just throw the BS-flag around anyway. So YOU can call, YOU can get the correction factor, then, YOU can post it up and tell everyone how right YOU were all along.

See, this thread was all about you all along an0mylous!

 

this is a pretty entertaining thread....hahaha......like the trash talk its sweet i cant believe one dude is irritating so many people hahaha

 

^^^ very true.. not to mention i think it uses a wideband sensor.. well at least the 09 ones will as wideband is an option on the the new performance display

 

that would be pretty sweet if they have a wideband...damit i all ready have mine ordered......

 

there in lies the problem.. there shouldn't been no sae correction... esp on the sstc so basically take away the corection factor and what do you have? stop sstc number.. go ahead rj continue to fail


thats at least what it looked like.. the new RPD says it could read o2 signals and it was reading like 15.3 on the gauge in the picture.. (it coul've been simulated)... and there also might be an upgrade you can buy for after the fact

 

screw all this crap........if the turbo runs at higher psi at a higher elevation......then it should be able to do down at my level.......i just wanna know how to do and do it safely....im kinda new to this


i should change my name to ssturborookie

 

least your honest lol unlike choko and rj

dyno the car again without correction factor... then tell me how much it makes.. you ignorant ****... if you know better rj then enlighten us.. since you're so "smart" also explain why a car with 270 hp and 300+ trq ran only a 14 at the track.. even with bad driving thats embarrassing because you ran only ran .9 faster the the fastest stock 2.4 on the site with 120 more whp..... .and ran slower then almost all the boosted 2.4s on the site... slower then most modded lsjs i don't think it's possible for you to fail anymore

 

[QUOTE=elecblue06;2527373]there in lies the problem.. there shouldn't been no sae correction... esp on the sstc so basically take away the corection factor and what do you have? stop sstc number.. go ahead rj continue to fail




thats at least what it looked like.. the new RPD says it could read o2 signals and it was reading like 15.3 on the gauge in the picture.. (it coul've been simulated)... and there also might be an upgrade you can buy for after the fact [/QUOTE


now if we could change values would be cool .......but how difficult would be with MAF opposed MAP

 

[QUOTE=ssturbo;2527401]no idea there's a thread on this forum about it check it out

 

LOL.....after i read all the post they seem to like to get everones gahunnas tied up in a knot ....haha.........i say ****'em if they say get 270 hp 300 tq then so be it ...... there awsome i guess....

 

I dont need to see it.
everyone already knows what the tq number will be.

 

BULLSHIT! I said I'd do it as soon as I got back from my deployment. And I have a considerable amount less than what his fake ass dyno numbers say.

 

riiiight, when do you get back from deployment 6 months from now a year?

 

the end of september, I already posted that. reading>you

 

Still no timeslip for proof...

...and I like how you were dialed in at a 14.75!

 

well isn't that festive

 

Do he dyno'd at the same (give or take) elevation that he ran the 1/4 at... why does correction factor have anything to do with that? If he truly dyno'd at those numbers, his 1/4 mile would be MUCH better.

Maybe you really did post those numbers - then that dyno is screwed up! Go to another dyno, have them dyno with an uncorrected (or corrected, but let us know the factor) and post the RPM vs numbers.

Post that, end this discussion. The more details you can post about a run ON A DIFFERENT dyno,the more people may believe you. There is a dyno at a track near here that they use to verify that all the cars are running about the same HP. This dyno read a friends car - in 10 runs on the dyno it varied by as much as 50 HP per run! He was pissed off at them so he got his car dynod at 4 different shops in 2 different states 5 runs each (20 runs total) and ALL of them came to within 1-2hp of each other. Sound like a problem with the tracks dyno? Maybe your shops dyno has issues.

Prove us wrong - get it dyno'd elsewhere, with all of the supporting evidence (video of the screen,corrected or uncorrected numbers (with factor), RPM vs power chart that doesn't look like it was created in MS paint.) I would love to get proved wrong, because with only a muffler delete this car can make that much power I would jump for joy. So far every dyno run that has been posted is not backing up those numbers.

 

I would but I would crush him. Also i dont have my cobalt anymore.

 

whats that speed3 runnin at the track with 21psi dark?

 

We'll find out soon. Track molested me last time i went there with just an intake and my motor mount failed.

still ran a 35 second lap at 36mph LOL