Taking the Turbobalt to the dyno.
Go jeremi go! Haha if any of you have doubts just hop on over to nyspeed and trailblazerss owners forums and search his name. This kid is the ******* king of nitrous. I really wouldn't doubt him.....
the PCM limits his power to 260.
End of argument.
just out of curiosity, but does anyone have a technical article to browse over about the computer, and how it limits power when it "detects" the car is making too much?
I'm not calling anyone a liar, i just think it'd be nice to read through an GM official article about it.
I'm not calling anyone a liar, i just think it'd be nice to read through an GM official article about it.
agreed. anom, did you design the pcm software? or have you seen it personally? if so then by all means go on stating that it limits power. i'd like to see some credible evidence that it does, and maybe it exists and i've missed it, but word of mouth means nothing. i wonder how all these sc guru's/fanboi's know so much about the ecu software architecture....
Alright an0 i got you man. My dad owns an hhr ss ive been doing research on that for awhile and people have tried to crack the ecm but havent been able to yet. Same ecu as the hhr ss and the solstice/sky gxp and so on. The LNF engines use a Bosch MED9.6 ecm if you want you can look that up as well for all of you non believers. Heres the proof read this guys comment.
http://www.solsticeforum.com/forum/466787-post7.html
http://img83.imageshack.us/my.php?im...chmatic3zu.jpg
Edited just confirming our ecm in the second one and what it controls
http://www.solsticeforum.com/forum/466787-post7.html
http://img83.imageshack.us/my.php?im...chmatic3zu.jpg
Edited just confirming our ecm in the second one and what it controls
2nd one is a technical article overview of our ecm the first one is a guy who talked to a Bosch engineer about or ecm and how it has a controlled tq system.
And this article is a US Patent that the invention does exist http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/63...scription.html
And this article is a US Patent that the invention does exist http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/63...scription.html
Last edited by rocco11189; Jun 26, 2008 at 06:11 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
positive about that? looks like it says e69 to me.
http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showpo...0&postcount=19
heres the rest of the thread
http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18410
http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showpo...0&postcount=19
heres the rest of the thread
http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18410
there are mixed rumors out there but the Hhr ss does use an E69 from what I read therefore it is the same relearning ecm. It doesnt change much besides the fact that there is torque management within the LNF engines.
Yea NJ I just read that before you posted it lol.
Yea NJ I just read that before you posted it lol.
haha ok. the only point im trying to make is we don't know too much about these computers yet besides what some have been told. the e69 or whatever it is is different from the cts e69, and both the e69 and the e77 are unsupported as of now. i think we should all just hold off on the flaming until we know more. because you don't know for sure whether this guy made these numbers, and to be honest, who cares?
Well it sucks for him because when you compare firemanfranks complete video and computer conformation of synapase's numbers of a stage 2 vs an ss/tc that is wayyyyy more believeable than this kid with a shitty vid and a graph that has paint written all over it. Just look at the Tq curve compared to firemanfranks graph.
yes. we have little automotive knowledge. were all just idiots.
how dare we challenge a dyno that is 50tq higher than the ecms limited level.
and 50tq higher than was just dynoed from a vendor on this forum
and 50tq higher than rated by GM.
of COURSE we should automatically believe that.
I have asked him 3 times so far to run it at the track.
to show how realistic these fluffy numbers are...
I even said i would eat crow if he runs low 13s (which he should with that much power)
and while your judging me for not taking his bet, how about you bet me 5 grand that i can make my car run 11s stock
i dare you.
but you wont will you, because you know how stupidly easy it would be for me to produce a slip.
and just as easy to spray a 75 shot, and call it "stock"
while your calling everyone haters, you should take your hand off his nuts.
its a little ambiguous
how dare we challenge a dyno that is 50tq higher than the ecms limited level.
and 50tq higher than was just dynoed from a vendor on this forum
and 50tq higher than rated by GM.
of COURSE we should automatically believe that.
I have asked him 3 times so far to run it at the track.
to show how realistic these fluffy numbers are...
I even said i would eat crow if he runs low 13s (which he should with that much power)
and while your judging me for not taking his bet, how about you bet me 5 grand that i can make my car run 11s stock
i dare you.
but you wont will you, because you know how stupidly easy it would be for me to produce a slip.
and just as easy to spray a 75 shot, and call it "stock"
while your calling everyone haters, you should take your hand off his nuts.
its a little ambiguous



