Taking the Turbobalt to the dyno.
Look, I for one wasn't bashing, just pointing out why the numbers look that way. Please show the same graph vs. RPMS, not mph. That will help out a lot of the people yelling so much about nothing.
I dynoed my car when it was 100% stock. LOWEST NUMBER, was 217/188, with SAE, and versus rpms. If I played with nothing but display options on the already recorded chart, I could get peak numbers over 235. Was that real? Maybe, but I would prefer to see the same type of measurement that other people accept as the standard. Its very real to make the computer show 10% more than the standard readout, its all in how you measure it. Doesn't make the car any faster though.
I dynoed my car when it was 100% stock. LOWEST NUMBER, was 217/188, with SAE, and versus rpms. If I played with nothing but display options on the already recorded chart, I could get peak numbers over 235. Was that real? Maybe, but I would prefer to see the same type of measurement that other people accept as the standard. Its very real to make the computer show 10% more than the standard readout, its all in how you measure it. Doesn't make the car any faster though.
I never said everyone. I said, that some of you guys were being justifiably skeptical and that a few were being jerks and just insulting, because they didn't want to believe the #s
So you belive that the cobalt made those number's, even though the ecm is limited to a certain power level with out tuning, and who gives a flying **** about dyno numbers if it's not gonna run at a track thats the real test.
OK - This is getting pretty funny -
Im gonna clear this up real quick with all the internet racers
If you dont have $ to put up with your replies & snappy ******* mouths ' keep your little mouth shut'
My TC vs anyone other TC on here that has been a internet thug.
$1,000 - 1/4 Mile
Either at Bandamiere in Colorado before june 15th
Or NYIRP in New York 18th - 25th
Of course most of you will keep yapping away / insecure and doubtfull on my #'s
Simple, lets do it @ the track for $1,000 ' ill even do 2 out of 3' if that makes you happy ' incase you miss a gear
* im not going to reply to this thread unless one of you agree to race your TC vs Mine ' ill check this thread tomm.
Im gonna clear this up real quick with all the internet racers
If you dont have $ to put up with your replies & snappy ******* mouths ' keep your little mouth shut'
My TC vs anyone other TC on here that has been a internet thug.
$1,000 - 1/4 Mile
Either at Bandamiere in Colorado before june 15th
Or NYIRP in New York 18th - 25th
Of course most of you will keep yapping away / insecure and doubtfull on my #'s
Simple, lets do it @ the track for $1,000 ' ill even do 2 out of 3' if that makes you happy ' incase you miss a gear
* im not going to reply to this thread unless one of you agree to race your TC vs Mine ' ill check this thread tomm.
Me? I believe that the dyno was made to show those numbers.
but when your lack of comprehension, and poor arguments continue to dribble out of your mouth, theres no point talking to you.
it seemed quite easy for many others to understand the point, but not you.
you called nothing out. because you never understood the comment in the first place.
blow me, ill challenge your pathetic inflated dyno numbers any time i wish.
you wanna shut me up. take that thing to the track and run 13.2 with your filter and muffler delete and ill shut up.
until then, your nothin but a punk with an attitude, and a piece of paper.
Last edited by an0malous; Jun 27, 2008 at 12:18 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Bring it down to NYI, I'll throw another $1000 if you can beat a 92 Ford Taurus! Oh you don't race for $ you Just sit behind your keyboard being an E-thing.
Last edited by RJ-92; Jun 27, 2008 at 01:58 AM.
nice numbers bro, MAC does all of my tuning and dynoing because they have one of the most accurate dynos in co and specialize in tuning using the accessport , their good people too. if your still in co when im able to start driving again in november we'll have to get a cruise going and you can run against a hopefully 1000bhp sti
must be a hard job being an ethug. better learn to pick battles, anom has more respect on this site then you will ever have, respect is earned not ethugged into. maybe if you contributed positively instead of ranted nonsense, you might not have to worry about people calling you out.
nope just really busy with work with it being summer and all
? for ya though do you recommend and 01-08 yamaha r6 raven edition for a 1st bike? maybe should i just get the r1? which year was the best? ive ridden dirtbikes since i was about 4 so im pretty experianced on a dirtbike but it cant be too much different can it? ill also be taking every class available in co for bikes
? for ya though do you recommend and 01-08 yamaha r6 raven edition for a 1st bike? maybe should i just get the r1? which year was the best? ive ridden dirtbikes since i was about 4 so im pretty experianced on a dirtbike but it cant be too much different can it? ill also be taking every class available in co for bikes
nope just really busy with work with it being summer and all
? for ya though do you recommend and 01-08 yamaha r6 raven edition for a 1st bike? maybe should i just get the r1? which year was the best? ive ridden dirtbikes since i was about 4 so im pretty experianced on a dirtbike but it cant be too much different can it? ill also be taking every class available in co for bikes
? for ya though do you recommend and 01-08 yamaha r6 raven edition for a 1st bike? maybe should i just get the r1? which year was the best? ive ridden dirtbikes since i was about 4 so im pretty experianced on a dirtbike but it cant be too much different can it? ill also be taking every class available in co for bikes
Street riding and dirt riding is a COMPLETELY different world...if you aren't a complete meathead and have a steady hand, you could get the R6...which is where some riding would be in your favor.
Take the MSF course and get your license that way...gear up too, and if it is too hot to wear gear, it is too hot to ride.
Get the rubber side down and get low my friend
possibility of me getting bored of a r6? maybe not enough power? deff full gear pants, jacket, gloves, and helmet even if im just going a block down the road, i always shake my head when i see ppl my age on bikes with their shirt off wearing their hat backwards with glasses.
possibility of me getting bored of a r6? maybe not enough power? deff full gear pants, jacket, gloves, and helmet even if im just going a block down the road, i always shake my head when i see ppl my age on bikes with their shirt off wearing their hat backwards with glasses.
110whp out of the box, 10 second 1/4, 16x mph top speed, 0-top speed-0 in under a mile.
Trust me, you will not get bored of a 600
If you want tippy top end get the Yami or a CBR 600RR, you want more midrange(i.e. roadcourse track) get a Gixxer 600
I am talking brand new bikes of course, but even as you go back Zooks have the most mid range and Yami have the peakiest powerbands
You tell me, you were the one dropping personal insults not I.
I'm seriously going to lose sleep over this, but again you must be reading the wrong posts. I am picking my battles. I'm not trying to E-thug anyone, I merely pointed out some simple principals of turbo charging that seem to be lost here, and got blasted for it.
See previous statement on principals of turbo charging. Not my fault you can't comprehend. Maybe you should just put a smaller pulley on it. I was simply trying to explain to you people why Choko's # are not only possible, but likely given basic knowledge of turbos but no one here seems to get that.
I recall being the one who made the call out, and apparently anom wants none of it, but want to throw verbiage around to show how tough he can be yet refuses to line his car up.
It appears you are the one lacking comprehension. No matter what you believe doesn't change the principals of a turboed internal combustion engine. If you did you wouldn't be so quick to post to the contrary. And if you could read and comprehend my posts you would be able to refute these claims using technical analysis and not personal attacks. Its not my fault turbos are too complicated for you. Stick with your blower *see comment above about pully*
My lack of comprehending what? The fact that you say so that means it must be so? Sorry for having a mind of my own and not bing one of you lemmings that sweat and swoon over everything you type. Your argument lack any basis. Back it up with some facts, "Mr. well i don't believe those #s so go to the track with a vid then i can respect you?" Who the **** are you? King of all things cobalt. Instead of critiquing everyones spelling here's a link for ya. I know it will be helpful.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/turbo.htm/printable
You have been called out 3 time to run now, but you'll ***** out and hide behind your keyboard and talk about comprehension and spelling and how Choko posted BS #, but you provide no argument to support it. Choko said he'd gladly take his car to the track to show you exactly what it'll run with those mods and invited you to be there, even gave you a $1000 incentive to see if you can beat him while doing it. But you have better thing to do, because you rule this forum and need to keep people in line, verbally, for all who post bogus Dyno #s. Quit being a ***** and put your fingers around the shifter rather than bouncing them franticly off your keyboard.
See previous statement on principals of turbo charging. Not my fault you can't comprehend. Maybe you should just put a smaller pulley on it. I was simply trying to explain to you people why Choko's # are not only possible, but likely given basic knowledge of turbos but no one here seems to get that.
I recall being the one who made the call out, and apparently anom wants none of it, but want to throw verbiage around to show how tough he can be yet refuses to line his car up.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/turbo.htm/printable
You have been called out 3 time to run now, but you'll ***** out and hide behind your keyboard and talk about comprehension and spelling and how Choko posted BS #, but you provide no argument to support it. Choko said he'd gladly take his car to the track to show you exactly what it'll run with those mods and invited you to be there, even gave you a $1000 incentive to see if you can beat him while doing it. But you have better thing to do, because you rule this forum and need to keep people in line, verbally, for all who post bogus Dyno #s. Quit being a ***** and put your fingers around the shifter rather than bouncing them franticly off your keyboard.
You tell me, you were the one dropping personal insults not I.
I'm seriously going to lose sleep over this, but again you must be reading the wrong posts. I am picking my battles. I'm not trying to E-thug anyone, I merely pointed out some simple principals of turbo charging that seem to be lost here, and got blasted for it.
See previous statement on principals of turbo charging. Not my fault you can't comprehend. Maybe you should just put a smaller pulley on it. I was simply trying to explain to you people why Choko's # are not only possible, but likely given basic knowledge of turbos but no one here seems to get that.
you might not have to worry about people calling you out.
I recall being the one who made the call out, and apparently anom wants none of it, but want to throw verbiage around to show how tough he can be yet refuses to line his car up.
It appears you are the one lacking comprehension. No matter what you believe doesn't change the principals of a turboed internal combustion engine. If you did you wouldn't be so quick to post to the contrary. And if you could read and comprehend my posts you would be able to refute these claims using technical analysis and not personal attacks. Its not my fault turbos are too complicated for you. Stick with your blower *see comment above about pully*
My lack of comprehending what? The fact that you say so that means it must be so? Sorry for having a mind of my own and not bing one of you lemmings that sweat and swoon over everything you type. Your argument lack any basis. Back it up with some facts, "Mr. well i don't believe those #s so go to the track with a vid then i can respect you?" Who the **** are you? King of all things cobalt. Instead of critiquing everyones spelling here's a link for ya. I know it will be helpful.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/turbo.htm/printable
it seemed quite easy for many others to understand the point, but not you.
You have been called out 3 time to run now, but you'll ***** out and hide behind your keyboard and talk about comprehension and spelling and how Choko posted BS #, but you provide no argument to support it. Choko said he'd gladly take his car to the track to show you exactly what it'll run with those mods and invited you to be there, even gave you a $1000 incentive to see if you can beat him while doing it. But you have better thing to do, because you rule this forum and need to keep people in line, verbally, for all who post bogus Dyno #s. Quit being a ***** and put your fingers around the shifter rather than bouncing them franticly off your keyboard.
I'm seriously going to lose sleep over this, but again you must be reading the wrong posts. I am picking my battles. I'm not trying to E-thug anyone, I merely pointed out some simple principals of turbo charging that seem to be lost here, and got blasted for it.
See previous statement on principals of turbo charging. Not my fault you can't comprehend. Maybe you should just put a smaller pulley on it. I was simply trying to explain to you people why Choko's # are not only possible, but likely given basic knowledge of turbos but no one here seems to get that.
you might not have to worry about people calling you out.
I recall being the one who made the call out, and apparently anom wants none of it, but want to throw verbiage around to show how tough he can be yet refuses to line his car up.
It appears you are the one lacking comprehension. No matter what you believe doesn't change the principals of a turboed internal combustion engine. If you did you wouldn't be so quick to post to the contrary. And if you could read and comprehend my posts you would be able to refute these claims using technical analysis and not personal attacks. Its not my fault turbos are too complicated for you. Stick with your blower *see comment above about pully*
My lack of comprehending what? The fact that you say so that means it must be so? Sorry for having a mind of my own and not bing one of you lemmings that sweat and swoon over everything you type. Your argument lack any basis. Back it up with some facts, "Mr. well i don't believe those #s so go to the track with a vid then i can respect you?" Who the **** are you? King of all things cobalt. Instead of critiquing everyones spelling here's a link for ya. I know it will be helpful.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/turbo.htm/printable
it seemed quite easy for many others to understand the point, but not you.
You have been called out 3 time to run now, but you'll ***** out and hide behind your keyboard and talk about comprehension and spelling and how Choko posted BS #, but you provide no argument to support it. Choko said he'd gladly take his car to the track to show you exactly what it'll run with those mods and invited you to be there, even gave you a $1000 incentive to see if you can beat him while doing it. But you have better thing to do, because you rule this forum and need to keep people in line, verbally, for all who post bogus Dyno #s. Quit being a ***** and put your fingers around the shifter rather than bouncing them franticly off your keyboard.

Seriously you fail.
So you are calling Steve a p00n because he won't waste his gas and travel to race someone?
Listen Paul Walker...I am sure he has a life and other things to do other than race
Let it die.
If dude has to take that much time out of his life then
at him
Just be careful, they are fast and not very forgiving...don't hop on it and expect to be fast like you were on your dirtbikes.
Forget everything you learned about dirtbikes and just be open to re learn everything
Forget everything you learned about dirtbikes and just be open to re learn everything
Last edited by steddy2112; Jun 27, 2008 at 02:58 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
You tell me, you were the one dropping personal insults not I.
I'm seriously going to lose sleep over this, but again you must be reading the wrong posts. I am picking my battles. I'm not trying to E-thug anyone, I merely pointed out some simple principals of turbo charging that seem to be lost here, and got blasted for it.
See previous statement on principals of turbo charging. Not my fault you can't comprehend. Maybe you should just put a smaller pulley on it. I was simply trying to explain to you people why Choko's # are not only possible, but likely given basic knowledge of turbos but no one here seems to get that.
.
I'm seriously going to lose sleep over this, but again you must be reading the wrong posts. I am picking my battles. I'm not trying to E-thug anyone, I merely pointed out some simple principals of turbo charging that seem to be lost here, and got blasted for it.
See previous statement on principals of turbo charging. Not my fault you can't comprehend. Maybe you should just put a smaller pulley on it. I was simply trying to explain to you people why Choko's # are not only possible, but likely given basic knowledge of turbos but no one here seems to get that.
.
Damn......I haven't finished my bag of popcorn yet!
I'm with all others here in this thread. I'd like to see a vid of this car at the track. That be a full run with a zoom in on the trap time after the run is finished. No run, break in the vid to show the time. One continuous video.
I'm with all others here in this thread. I'd like to see a vid of this car at the track. That be a full run with a zoom in on the trap time after the run is finished. No run, break in the vid to show the time. One continuous video.


