2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Supercharger Swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 12:20 AM
  #176  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
What if someone offered like $15,000 do you think they would do it?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 12:26 AM
  #177  
patathSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-15-05
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
From: OP, KS
Originally Posted by patathSS
Where did you figure out the pulley size?
Any answer?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 12:37 AM
  #178  
vandy0419's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-10-06
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, OH
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
What if someone offered like $15,000 do you think they would do it?
I wouldn't even bother...I'd buy a 1.5L KB kit for a Ford Escape, sell everything on eBay but the supercharger, then modify it on there...that kit is only $3k...
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 12:55 AM
  #179  
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Originally Posted by patathSS
Any answer?
Yeah it was on the previous page.
Originally Posted by Cobalt_Supercharged
Originally Posted by patathSS
Where did you figure out the pulley size?
The drive ratio on the bottom right. Divide the crank pulley size (~6.25" from what I have read) by the drive ratio. The calculator is not all that accurate IMO.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 01:00 AM
  #180  
patathSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-15-05
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
From: OP, KS
Ok thanks. I totaly missed it. I agree the calculator is off but I don't know in which direction. I lean towards it saying bigger than necessary.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 01:05 AM
  #181  
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Originally Posted by patathSS
Ok thanks. I totaly missed it. I agree the calculator is off but I don't know in which direction. I lean towards it saying bigger than necessary.
Yeah. I think it is telling us a bigger pulley than what is really needed. In other words less boost and power meaning safer for the engine.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 01:06 AM
  #182  
patathSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-15-05
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
From: OP, KS
So we really should be able to run a smaller pulley and therefor have more room right?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 01:14 AM
  #183  
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Yes the smaller pulley would allow you more room physically and would give you a better chance of fitting the belt.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 01:16 AM
  #184  
patathSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-15-05
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
From: OP, KS
ZING!!! haha ok food for thought I guess. I can't believe those chargers have such a low RPM limit though.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 01:31 AM
  #185  
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Originally Posted by patathSS
ZING!!! haha ok food for thought I guess. I can't believe those chargers have such a low RPM limit though.
Yeah the 1.33 is kinda suprising at only 13,000. Really suprising with the 13,500 with the 1200AX since the Whipple version could spin to 20,000!

If you think about it though, the 3/5 rotor design has one rotor spinning at 13,500 and the other spinning at 22,500. The Whipple would be spinning at 20,000 would make the 3 lobe rotor spin at 33,333!!!
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 12:00 AM
  #186  
BLKblurr06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
hopefully the new Eaton TVS supercharger will be worth waiting for... thats when turbocharbed cars will no longer have the advantage on the street.... If everything heard through the pipeline is true.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 12:15 AM
  #187  
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Originally Posted by BLKblurr06
hopefully the new Eaton TVS supercharger will be worth waiting for... thats when turbocharbed cars will no longer have the advantage on the street.... If everything heard through the pipeline is true.
I doubt it will. It is only a 5% volumetric efficiency increase. It is still a roots so it will compress the air externally making more heat than an internal compression compressor ie centrifigal, turbo, twin screw.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 02:04 PM
  #188  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
yeah what he said ^^^
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 03:06 PM
  #189  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
The TVS is an improvement indeed, but I don't think it'll make the numbers people are expecting. The twinscrew is still the way to go. Max boost from 2000rpms till you have to shift is right up my alley.

On the supercharger rpm deal, remember a twinscrew is putting out more CFM's, thus it doesn't have to spin as fast to do the same work. Not spinning as fast also helps with keeping the heat down and reducing the parasitic loss from spinning the blower. I hope certainly hope I can scrounge up enough play money to make a twinscrew swap happen when I get back.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
brandon04
Problems/Service/Maintenance
46
Oct 21, 2015 07:04 AM
ThoR294
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
4
Oct 4, 2015 08:44 PM
ThoR294
General Cobalt
6
Sep 28, 2015 05:31 PM
z28addiction
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
Sep 28, 2015 12:03 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 PM.