Tvs 1900....ottp stg5?
why all the b.s in this thread ???? if you like the new 1900 option sweeet, lets get some guinea pigs going.
if you dont like it, thats great too but why clutter the thread b.s ?
if you think turbo is better, there is a thread for that ... i just dont understand all the bickering.
the title of the thread is not "turbo vs 1900" just to clear that up.
if you dont like it, thats great too but why clutter the thread b.s ?
if you think turbo is better, there is a thread for that ... i just dont understand all the bickering.
the title of the thread is not "turbo vs 1900" just to clear that up.
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
why all the b.s in this thread ???? if you like the new 1900 option sweeet, lets get some guinea pigs going.
if you dont like it, thats great too but why clutter the thread b.s ?
if you think turbo is better, there is a thread for that ... i just dont understand all the bickering.
the title of the thread is not "turbo vs 1900" just to clear that up.
if you dont like it, thats great too but why clutter the thread b.s ?
if you think turbo is better, there is a thread for that ... i just dont understand all the bickering.
the title of the thread is not "turbo vs 1900" just to clear that up.
Always turns into a battle though.
I'm going to start deleting any turbo talk....
Last edited by Staged07SS; Oct 27, 2014 at 10:30 AM.
Me personally, id rather take that info over anyone else.
But what if you double the flow? Increase the system capacity? Put on a better heat exchanger for more heat extraction? Put on a more efficient supercharger? Like I said those are just numbers and they will be put to the test soon.
Soon. Both units will be shipping out this week to customers for testing and dyno time. My car isn't ready so I don't get to play yet. I should have numbers in about 2 weeks.
Is this what it's going to sound like if so it's going to be sweet just for the sound alone
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...qz3reuI05yeCLw
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...qz3reuI05yeCLw
I remember when the 1320 came out and everyone was bitching and moan for a turbo.
2300 for a blower is pricey
For me there was only two options it was either the gay hahn kit for 4k or the TVS
the choice was clear...
2300 for a blower is pricey
For me there was only two options it was either the gay hahn kit for 4k or the TVS
the choice was clear...
Last edited by 26gen4; Oct 27, 2014 at 09:50 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.6 pulley = 15,066.66 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.5 pulley = 15,497.14 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.4 pulley = 15,952.94 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.3 pulley = 16,436.36 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.2 pulley = 16,950.00 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.1 pulley = 17,496.77 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.0 pulley = 18,080.00 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 2.9 pulley = 18,703.44 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 2.8 pulley = 19,371.42 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 2.7 pulley = 20,088.88 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 2.6 pulley = 20,861.53 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 2.5 pulley = 21,696.00 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 2.4 pulley = 22,600.00 RPM





Eaton's Isentropic Efficiency Map


A tvs 1320:
8000 RPM X 6.78 ATI / 2.6 Pulley = 20,861.53 RPM
Roughly between 1600 - 1700 m^3/hr or 941.72 cfm - 1000.58 cfm
(22 PSI - 28 PSI ~ Depending on if you go whole hog like Infraredline's head or just a port/polish/gasket match)
m^3/hr to cfm converter
http://www.endmemo.com/sconvert/m3_hft3_min.php
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.5 pulley = 15,497.14 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.4 pulley = 15,952.94 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.3 pulley = 16,436.36 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.2 pulley = 16,950.00 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.1 pulley = 17,496.77 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 3.0 pulley = 18,080.00 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 2.9 pulley = 18,703.44 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 2.8 pulley = 19,371.42 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 2.7 pulley = 20,088.88 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 2.6 pulley = 20,861.53 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 2.5 pulley = 21,696.00 RPM
8000 rpm x 6.78 ATI / 2.4 pulley = 22,600.00 RPM





Eaton's Isentropic Efficiency Map


A tvs 1320:
8000 RPM X 6.78 ATI / 2.6 Pulley = 20,861.53 RPM
Roughly between 1600 - 1700 m^3/hr or 941.72 cfm - 1000.58 cfm
(22 PSI - 28 PSI ~ Depending on if you go whole hog like Infraredline's head or just a port/polish/gasket match)
m^3/hr to cfm converter
http://www.endmemo.com/sconvert/m3_hft3_min.php
Last edited by 100% METH; Oct 28, 2014 at 09:37 AM.
Mother of God that thing can flow about 1200 CFM max which is impressive. Looks like a 3.0 pulley will max it out around 18000RPMs at 8000 RPMs most will likely run larger than a 3.0 with it though.
Delta Temp and VE say F U after 18 psi [Insert water injection pre-blower here]



