2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Tvs 1900....ottp stg5?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 28, 2014 | 09:41 AM
  #201  
100% METH's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 01-02-10
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 15
From: Los Angeles
Max speed is dictated by the bearings

Eaton shows up to 17500 RPM; but we know based on the m62 that it can go considerably faster


Last edited by 100% METH; Oct 28, 2014 at 12:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2014 | 01:18 PM
  #202  
mezzanno's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-07-06
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Nassau County Long Island NY
Originally Posted by Terminator2
What is max speed 20000 RPMs?
Some ctsv guys spin 25000 rpm
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2014 | 03:26 PM
  #203  
SSfamilywagon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 09-07-08
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
I've been really thinking about this lately. What if we run an under driven crank pulley(smaller like 5.75) to slow the blower down for the guys that like to rev high above 7500 and so on to keep the blower speed down and more efficient?

Last edited by SSfamilywagon; Oct 28, 2014 at 04:33 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2014 | 04:01 PM
  #204  
Josh@ottp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-26-07
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 15
From: Michigan
I am still waiting to see what maps Harrop has for the blowers. From what I have found though it looks like the m62 takes over 60hp to spin at 16,000 rpm at 20 psi.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2014 | 06:32 PM
  #205  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Josh@ottp
I am still waiting to see what maps Harrop has for the blowers. From what I have found though it looks like the m62 takes over 60hp to spin at 16,000 rpm at 20 psi.
The 1900 looks to take around 100 hp to turn it at 18000 rpms and 18 psi which is about 40hp more than the M62 but the air output of the 1900 is way higher so it is more efficient than the M62 overall.

Edit Just saw the M62 at 16000 so IIRC the 1900 at 16000 was around 85 hp to drive it which is not far off the M62.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2014 | 06:36 PM
  #206  
KMO43's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 6,896
Likes: 96
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by Terminator2
The 1900 looks to take around 100 hp to turn it at 18000 rpms and 18 psi which is about 40hp more than the M62 but the air output of the 1900 is way higher so it is more efficient than the M62 overall.
That's my findings too. So to make 500hp the engine is actually putting out at least 600hp
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 12:31 AM
  #207  
ThexGovenor's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 12-19-11
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1
From: University Place, WA
Hey guys, in reference to the debate about how much HP the laminovas can handle. I found this article with the formulas to calculate . I don't know the dimensions of the cores but here it is for someone more knowledgeable than me. Hope it helps.Lamiflow Intercooler FAQ
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 01:07 PM
  #208  
BoomInIt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-24-05
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: new orleans
Originally Posted by Staged07SS
Until I made 370whp myself, I would never call that lack luster by any means.

With 370whp a good driver should dip into the high 11's. That's quick no matter how you look at it.

Everyone on this site is so focused on dyno queen numbers.
Agreed.
I will definitely be interested in this blower set up as I am looking for more than my 1.2L Twinscrew. I enjoy the linear power band of the supercharger. As i recall my twinscrew put down 354whp and around 330tq on E100 with Meth and supporting mods back in 06-07. I was big in the street racing scene and consistently beat 12 sec cars. High 11's/ low 12's was the average with traction running 245-45-17 555r's . Myself and 2kSS/SC were supercharger swap OG's along with a few others. Had a lot of issues at the start, but further kit development and tuning finally got me the power I was looking for.Some people just don't want turbo, and with supercharging you have to PAY to PLAY. A guy in Florida had a 1.33L Kennebell on his cobalt around the same time which was very fast. I have raced quite a few Tvs cars and they could not compare to my torque monster 14psi at 2k and 25-26psi up top, not to mention the cool blower whine of the twinscrew.
Put me on the list for one of these blowers set ups as I think i could gain an easy extra 100whp. I was excited when I saw the Hotrod magazine article back in 09 and have been awaiting a 1.9L kit, thanks OTTP!
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 01:37 PM
  #209  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by BoomInIt
Agreed.
I will definitely be interested in this blower set up as I am looking for more than my 1.2L Twinscrew. I enjoy the linear power band of the supercharger. As i recall my twinscrew put down 354whp and around 330tq on E100 with Meth and supporting mods back in 06-07. I was big in the street racing scene and consistently beat 12 sec cars. High 11's/ low 12's was the average with traction running 245-45-17 555r's . Myself and 2kSS/SC were supercharger swap OG's along with a few others. Had a lot of issues at the start, but further kit development and tuning finally got me the power I was looking for.Some people just don't want turbo, and with supercharging you have to PAY to PLAY. A guy in Florida had a 1.33L Kennebell on his cobalt around the same time which was very fast. I have raced quite a few Tvs cars and they could not compare to my torque monster 14psi at 2k and 25-26psi up top, not to mention the cool blower whine of the twinscrew.
Put me on the list for one of these blowers set ups as I think i could gain an easy extra 100whp. I was excited when I saw the Hotrod magazine article back in 09 and have been awaiting a 1.9L kit, thanks OTTP!
I remember you guys and your TS.

Do you still have your graph? I'll add you to the dyno thread.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 04:10 PM
  #210  
100% METH's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 01-02-10
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 15
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Josh@ottp
I am still waiting to see what maps Harrop has for the blowers. From what I have found though it looks like the m62 takes over 60hp to spin at 16,000 rpm at 20 psi.


Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 05:22 PM
  #211  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by 100% METH


Power to drive is half of what it takes to drive the 1900 at a given speed. Flow is about half of what the 1900 flows.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 09:59 PM
  #212  
100% METH's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 01-02-10
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 15
From: Los Angeles
It's not linear, but it is close

Notice the line becoming more obtuse
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 02:51 AM
  #213  
100% METH's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 01-02-10
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 15
From: Los Angeles
Take a look at what the mp62 is doing at 2.2 PR by 15,500 rpm

Delta temps are outrageous and it robs almost as much power as a Tvs 1900 at 18 psi / 15,500 rpm
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 02:42 PM
  #214  
Fidget's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-31-06
Posts: 893
Likes: 3
From: Cambridge Ontario Canada
Sub'd
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2014 | 12:24 AM
  #215  
KTM's Avatar
KTM
Member
 
Joined: 10-26-13
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: Uniontown, Pa
Applied for a job last week, going to be another week or two until I get a call back probably. If I get the job, I'll be buying this by January.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 02:11 PM
  #216  
Shanman's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 06-21-06
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: NM
Sub'd Whoever the 2 1900 received guys are need to speak up! We want answers!
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2014 | 08:10 PM
  #217  
riceburner's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: 05-18-11
Posts: 39,564
Likes: 87
From: West Chicago, IL
Bump dammit bump!!! I wanna see some 1900 action!
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2014 | 09:43 PM
  #218  
Blowncavy's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 992
Likes: 2
From: Fort myers, Florida
Seen this on instagram
Tvs2300 k series accord

Some good numbers
http://iconosquare.com/timot_one
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 07:49 AM
  #219  
phatnackySS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-03-06
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 4
From: Merritt Island ,Fl
Originally Posted by Blowncavy
Seen this on instagram
Tvs2300 k series accord

Some good numbers
Tim Michaliszyn - @timot_one Instagram profile | Iconosquare
I'll relocate my radiators , cut my front support and roll hoodless if someone would just make this without worrying about making it fit in the same footprint as the stock IM.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 04:16 PM
  #220  
Bluelightning's Avatar
Got Bewst?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 03-16-10
Posts: 10,948
Likes: 33
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
I'm pretty sure ZZP tried a style similar like that and the gains were minimal so it was never released.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 05:01 PM
  #221  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
what zzp tried was not even close to that
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 05:19 PM
  #222  
Bluelightning's Avatar
Got Bewst?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 03-16-10
Posts: 10,948
Likes: 33
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Ah ok my bad haha
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 06:09 PM
  #223  
TStone's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 02-21-11
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 7
From: Dayton, Ohio
Interesting. That car is local to me and so is the guy that did the fab work on it. Both of them are great friends with LSJion
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 10:06 PM
  #224  
andrewcarr1993's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 10-23-12
Posts: 5,095
Likes: 2
From: Clarence, NY
I know this would make it more laggy but I don't get why more people don't go with an intercooled supercharger setup.

If this is a stupid question I apologise, I honestly don't know nearly as much about custom options for our supercharger setup.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2014 | 08:52 AM
  #225  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
blowers dont move air over a long distance very well

flint did an air to air setup and it did not pan out well
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 AM.