North Central ND, SD, MN, and WI

Minnesota chat 2010 ( . )( . )

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 11:10 PM
  #1276  
007CobaltLS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-03-07
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
Originally Posted by rallyracer
18's would look nice but I guess 17's would be cheaper...and so should 17" tires.
I love the look of 18's, but I think that's what was keeping me from getting tires...It's like $100+ less for a set of KDW2's in 225/45 17 than 225/40 18. That I could handle...plus I think I could find a good deal on a set of 17's (there are a lot more 4x100 17's out there from Honda's and Mini's and what not than there are 18's)...so I could probably get a used set of wheels and a new set of tires for a pretty good deal.

I think I'll just have to wait and see like everything else...concentrate on the exhaust and suspension at the moment, then go from there and see what I wind up with.

Going to Vegas, huh? Have fun...loved it when my wife and I went...can't believe it was way back in Sept. of 06...we got married there...fun as hell...stayed at the Flamingo and got married there as well (they have a pretty nice little chapel).

Last edited by 007CobaltLS; Mar 27, 2010 at 11:10 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 11:12 PM
  #1277  
06_ion2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-12-06
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 2
From: minnesota
Well might not be around for CED meet I got some orders today apparently.
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 11:35 PM
  #1278  
007CobaltLS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-03-07
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
For where? What branch are you in again?
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 11:37 PM
  #1279  
PRND3L's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-23-08
Posts: 3,767
Likes: 0
From: Somers, Wisconsin
anyone have 6k i can borrow??


http://www.shophemi.com/p-1269-57-61...ercharger.aspx
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 11:39 PM
  #1280  
06_ion2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-12-06
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 2
From: minnesota
Originally Posted by 007CobaltLS
For where? What branch are you in again?
I cannot say for where, but im in the Army.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 12:15 AM
  #1281  
007CobaltLS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-03-07
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
Originally Posted by 06_ion2
I cannot say for where, but im in the Army.

OK, can you be non-specific...say maybe what continent you're going to?

Originally Posted by PRND3L
If you can loan me $3k to get the ZZP SC setup, I'll loan you $6k for that.

Last edited by 007CobaltLS; Mar 28, 2010 at 12:15 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 12:26 AM
  #1282  
PRND3L's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-23-08
Posts: 3,767
Likes: 0
From: Somers, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by 007CobaltLS
OK, can you be non-specific...say maybe what continent you're going to?



If you can loan me $3k to get the ZZP SC setup, I'll loan you $6k for that.
I was reading the new Mustang HP numbers, looks bad for me. Once im done with my ram air, im probably ordering gears and a tuner. 6k is too much for me to spend in Mods. Should have just bought an SRT and got it over with!
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 12:31 AM
  #1283  
007CobaltLS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-03-07
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
Yeah, but you'd still want more even if you got the SRT8 variant...
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 09:51 AM
  #1284  
freshyellowss's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-23-06
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Maple Grove, MN.
Sorry wasn't me by MOA, I was at home in otsego that is far from MOA. You can tell if it is me I got (coblat ss) on top of windshield.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:01 AM
  #1285  
ecotecturbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-09
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
From: Mn
Originally Posted by PRND3L
I was reading the new Mustang HP numbers, looks bad for me. Once im done with my ram air, im probably ordering gears and a tuner. 6k is too much for me to spend in Mods. Should have just bought an SRT and got it over with!
Yes you should have bought the srt8.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:45 AM
  #1286  
PRND3L's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-23-08
Posts: 3,767
Likes: 0
From: Somers, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by ecotecturbo
Yes you should have bought the srt8.
I cant see paying 45k for a car, 38 was too much. 35k is where i draw the line, and i got mine for just over 35k. My R/T only has 43 less HP and 27 less Tq than an SRT.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:22 AM
  #1287  
007CobaltLS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-03-07
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
But there are a few other differences besides a little more power...suspension, brakes, forged wheels, bi-xenon lights, heated seats, keyless go, sat radio, maybe other stuff...

My question is what kind of mileage do you get with it? Is it pretty decent? Hands down I love the looks of the Challenger the most. I'd probably still buy a Mustang or Camaro first though.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:31 AM
  #1288  
PRND3L's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-23-08
Posts: 3,767
Likes: 0
From: Somers, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by 007CobaltLS
But there are a few other differences besides a little more power...suspension, brakes, forged wheels, bi-xenon lights, heated seats, keyless go, sat radio, maybe other stuff...

My question is what kind of mileage do you get with it? Is it pretty decent? Hands down I love the looks of the Challenger the most. I'd probably still buy a Mustang or Camaro first though.
First, i have "Performance Brakes and Performance suspension" , its not SRT Beilstiens or brembos, but better than a reg. R/T. I have Heated seats, keyless go, Sat radio. I do not have Nav, but i dont like the MyGiG radios. Its rated at 17 city, 25 hwy, but the way i drive i get about 16 all the time, which is better than the 12.5 i got out of the Ram. With the Challenger, you can actually put people in the back seat, depending on the front seat passengers size. If you are 5'9, you can have a guy in the back and a 6'0 guy in the front. Im 6'5 and i put the seat all the way back, so no one is sitting behind me.


Plus the Insurance would have been over 800 every 6 months, i currently pay 592 for 6 months full coverage.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:37 AM
  #1289  
ecotecturbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-09
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
From: Mn
Originally Posted by PRND3L
I cant see paying 45k for a car, 38 was too much. 35k is where i draw the line, and i got mine for just over 35k. My R/T only has 43 less HP and 27 less Tq than an SRT.
The srt8 has 425, the rt has 350. How is that 43hp?
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:37 AM
  #1290  
PRND3L's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-23-08
Posts: 3,767
Likes: 0
From: Somers, Wisconsin
Looks like ive got close to 360 WHP, here is a 2010 Challenger R/T 6spd but same engine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98EBI...layer_embedded
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:38 AM
  #1291  
PRND3L's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-23-08
Posts: 3,767
Likes: 0
From: Somers, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by ecotecturbo
The srt8 has 425, the rt has 350. How is that 43hp?
the 09 5.7L Hemis and up have VVT, intake runners, and diffenent programming, HP is up to 372 and tq is 398
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:39 AM
  #1292  
ecotecturbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-09
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
From: Mn
Originally Posted by PRND3L
Looks like ive got close to 360 WHP, here is a 2010 Challenger R/T 6spd but same engine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98EBI...layer_embedded
Your car should make about 300 to the wheels.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:40 AM
  #1293  
007CobaltLS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-03-07
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
Originally Posted by ecotecturbo
The srt8 has 425, the rt has 350. How is that 43hp?
No, the 5.7 is rated at 372 now...they increased the power...I made the same mistake talking to a friend of mine who picked up a Charger R/T...I didn't know they made more power now and she was giving me **** about it until I looked it up online.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:40 AM
  #1294  
PRND3L's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-23-08
Posts: 3,767
Likes: 0
From: Somers, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by ecotecturbo
Your car should make about 300 to the wheels.
The auto doesnt eat that much HP.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:44 AM
  #1295  
007CobaltLS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-03-07
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
I'm only 5'7" so I have no problem fitting people around me...that's why I like my Cobalt so much...I just don't care for big cars usually. Yet I have no problem driving a big-ass single axle truck for work.

Also, PRND3L is correct, the AT in those cars really doesn't lose much HP like a FWD car does. I'd say he has about 340hp to the wheels.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:44 AM
  #1296  
ecotecturbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-09
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
From: Mn
Originally Posted by PRND3L
The auto doesnt eat that much HP.
That car was not bone stock. With an auto you usually see 25% loss to the wheels
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:52 AM
  #1297  
007CobaltLS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-03-07
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
Just curious...for your insurance rates...how old are you? If you're younger, do you live with your parents or do you own your own home (meaning multiple lines of insurance)?

My 2.2 Cobalt is $400 every 6 months which is reasonable...I could get an SS/TC sedan for probably the same you're paying every 6 months for full coverage, but I'll bet if I had your car, my insurance would be more. I do have higher coverage though, not minimum's. Otherwise my insurance would be about $10-15 a month cheaper.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:54 AM
  #1298  
ecotecturbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-09
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
From: Mn
Originally Posted by 007CobaltLS
I'm only 5'7" so I have no problem fitting people around me...that's why I like my Cobalt so much...I just don't care for big cars usually. Yet I have no problem driving a big-ass single axle truck for work.

Also, PRND3L is correct, the AT in those cars really doesn't lose much HP like a FWD car does. I'd say he has about 340hp to the wheels.
RWD has a lot more drivetrain loss than FWD.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:55 AM
  #1299  
PRND3L's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-23-08
Posts: 3,767
Likes: 0
From: Somers, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by ecotecturbo
That car was not bone stock. With an auto you usually see 25% loss to the wheels
I know the guy, it is bone stock. All he has done is taken the Resinators off his exhaust, but mine doesnt have Resinators (part of the Classic package) It could be that Chrysler Underrated the HP.
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 11:57 AM
  #1300  
007CobaltLS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-03-07
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
Originally Posted by ecotecturbo
RWD has a lot more drivetrain loss than FWD.
My car had a bit over 25% drivetrain loss...my stock dyno was 112hp and the car is rated at 150 at the crank roughly...I know a lot of RWD cars that have a bit less power loss than that.

I was on a dyno dynamics though and I believe the person doing the dyno didn't work with auto's very often so it's a little different...I think my car would actually be closer to 120hp if done correctly, but that's irrelevant really.

I'm hoping with the engine and tranny mounts being installed I will see some of that power back.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:38 PM.