Minnesota chat 2010 ( . )( . )
I think I'll just have to wait and see like everything else...concentrate on the exhaust and suspension at the moment, then go from there and see what I wind up with.
Going to Vegas, huh? Have fun...loved it when my wife and I went...can't believe it was way back in Sept. of 06...we got married there...fun as hell...stayed at the Flamingo and got married there as well (they have a pretty nice little chapel).
Last edited by 007CobaltLS; Mar 27, 2010 at 11:10 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
OK, can you be non-specific...say maybe what continent you're going to?
Last edited by 007CobaltLS; Mar 28, 2010 at 12:15 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I was reading the new Mustang HP numbers, looks bad for me. Once im done with my ram air, im probably ordering gears and a tuner. 6k is too much for me to spend in Mods. Should have just bought an SRT and got it over with!
But there are a few other differences besides a little more power...suspension, brakes, forged wheels, bi-xenon lights, heated seats, keyless go, sat radio, maybe other stuff...
My question is what kind of mileage do you get with it? Is it pretty decent? Hands down I love the looks of the Challenger the most. I'd probably still buy a Mustang or Camaro first though.
My question is what kind of mileage do you get with it? Is it pretty decent? Hands down I love the looks of the Challenger the most. I'd probably still buy a Mustang or Camaro first though.
But there are a few other differences besides a little more power...suspension, brakes, forged wheels, bi-xenon lights, heated seats, keyless go, sat radio, maybe other stuff...
My question is what kind of mileage do you get with it? Is it pretty decent? Hands down I love the looks of the Challenger the most. I'd probably still buy a Mustang or Camaro first though.
My question is what kind of mileage do you get with it? Is it pretty decent? Hands down I love the looks of the Challenger the most. I'd probably still buy a Mustang or Camaro first though.
Plus the Insurance would have been over 800 every 6 months, i currently pay 592 for 6 months full coverage.
Looks like ive got close to 360 WHP, here is a 2010 Challenger R/T 6spd but same engine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98EBI...layer_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98EBI...layer_embedded
Looks like ive got close to 360 WHP, here is a 2010 Challenger R/T 6spd but same engine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98EBI...layer_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98EBI...layer_embedded
No, the 5.7 is rated at 372 now...they increased the power...I made the same mistake talking to a friend of mine who picked up a Charger R/T...I didn't know they made more power now and she was giving me **** about it until I looked it up online.
I'm only 5'7" so I have no problem fitting people around me...that's why I like my Cobalt so much...I just don't care for big cars usually. Yet I have no problem driving a big-ass single axle truck for work.
Also, PRND3L is correct, the AT in those cars really doesn't lose much HP like a FWD car does. I'd say he has about 340hp to the wheels.
Also, PRND3L is correct, the AT in those cars really doesn't lose much HP like a FWD car does. I'd say he has about 340hp to the wheels.
Just curious...for your insurance rates...how old are you? If you're younger, do you live with your parents or do you own your own home (meaning multiple lines of insurance)?
My 2.2 Cobalt is $400 every 6 months which is reasonable...I could get an SS/TC sedan for probably the same you're paying every 6 months for full coverage, but I'll bet if I had your car, my insurance would be more. I do have higher coverage though, not minimum's. Otherwise my insurance would be about $10-15 a month cheaper.
My 2.2 Cobalt is $400 every 6 months which is reasonable...I could get an SS/TC sedan for probably the same you're paying every 6 months for full coverage, but I'll bet if I had your car, my insurance would be more. I do have higher coverage though, not minimum's. Otherwise my insurance would be about $10-15 a month cheaper.
I'm only 5'7" so I have no problem fitting people around me...that's why I like my Cobalt so much...I just don't care for big cars usually. Yet I have no problem driving a big-ass single axle truck for work.
Also, PRND3L is correct, the AT in those cars really doesn't lose much HP like a FWD car does. I'd say he has about 340hp to the wheels.
Also, PRND3L is correct, the AT in those cars really doesn't lose much HP like a FWD car does. I'd say he has about 340hp to the wheels.
I know the guy, it is bone stock. All he has done is taken the Resinators off his exhaust, but mine doesnt have Resinators (part of the Classic package) It could be that Chrysler Underrated the HP.
My car had a bit over 25% drivetrain loss...my stock dyno was 112hp and the car is rated at 150 at the crank roughly...I know a lot of RWD cars that have a bit less power loss than that.
I was on a dyno dynamics though and I believe the person doing the dyno didn't work with auto's very often so it's a little different...I think my car would actually be closer to 120hp if done correctly, but that's irrelevant really.
I'm hoping with the engine and tranny mounts being installed I will see some of that power back.
I was on a dyno dynamics though and I believe the person doing the dyno didn't work with auto's very often so it's a little different...I think my car would actually be closer to 120hp if done correctly, but that's irrelevant really.
I'm hoping with the engine and tranny mounts being installed I will see some of that power back.


