2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

ZZP Builds The Best LNF Mod Ever!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 09:02 PM
  #876  
ULWizSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 07-30-10
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 1
From: Florence, NJ
Originally Posted by gmtech16450yz
Lol. Love you too Matt.

So you talking the power you quote from your magic dyno or the numbers those cars do on an impartial, unbiased dyno when the customer gets their car back? There's usually about 100hp difference between those two. Hey guys, why do you think ZZP makes claims like what Matt just said above? Ever notice how ABSOLUTELY SURE they are that they make more power than anyone else? It's because they know they can manipulate the HP numbers higher than anyone else. Anyone that's that sure their HP numbers are higher than ANYONE else's is either ignorant or ???? I might know a little more about what goes on at ZZP than you might think.




Exactly. This is the part I had a problem with. You guys at ZZP have got all these guys holding their breath because of this thread. How long will it actually be before you have a working kit on the road? I'm betting a few of the guys that first saw this thread won't even own a car with an LNF by the time you have it ready for sale. Maybe YOU shouldn't have been so cocky with your title of the thread and the fact you had no idea of when you would actually be able to provide the "Best Mod Ever" to these members and customers. That's exactly the definition of "Vaporware", it's when the software or tech companies release information on their amazing new software or hardware, when they aren't actually even close to having a product to release. What it does is make all those hungry buyers wait for something that never comes to market or isn't what it was originally billed as.

You guys can call me whatever you want, I couldn't care less. I call 'em like I see 'em and nothing I've said is BS. It's either my opinion or it's fact. Take it or leave it.

Yeah definately dont like the bashing of zzp at all. I personally think its a smart way to go to prewarn customers that they are releasing a new option. If they would not have had a release date i would have never gotten a hold of my stage 2 trans and would have just gotten a stock one. Dont all companies do something similar. People though the stage transmission would take forever to come out. On the website they had a date posted of release. I called steve and let him know i wanted one and the minute it became available and before their due date they where available for ordering. And maybe prewarning customers gives them a chance to save up for a kit like this. Keep in mind its mostly young kids driving these cars and not adults.

And honestly i like it when vendors make me hold my breath, makes me look forward to whats coming up in the future.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 09:05 PM
  #877  
matt638's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-01-10
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
i want this!!!!!
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 09:30 PM
  #878  
09BlueBaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-09
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 0
From: Davie, Fl
Originally Posted by donkeyballs
What were your dyno numbers on pump gas only? I know a few people running the EFR and all seem to be pretty close and i know you guys are running your head/cam combo so that helps a bunch.

I have worked all the bugs out of mine finally but i'm out of fuel pressure on full E85 and can only hold 50% throttle and it still goes in reduce power from low fuel rail pressure Did you guys come out with the secondary injector kit yet or know of a way i can get this straightened out? On the upside I'm flowing over 50 maf lb/min @ half throttle lol so i know its gonna be a monster when running 100%
maf skew %?

The maps ive have the 6758 topping out around 49-50 lb/min
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 10:01 PM
  #879  
donkeyballs's Avatar
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-08-10
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 1
From: buffalo
Originally Posted by 09BlueBaltSS
maf skew %?

The maps ive have the 6758 topping out around 49-50 lb/min
Not sure.. let me ask my tuner he would know the accurate answer. It is normally 49-52 max in second gear where it doesn't eat as much fuel (less load) and i can hold it wot but i don't take my car much past 6300rpms so it would be higher if i took it to 7k. It is about 50ish 3rd gear 50% throttle 6400rpms. I need to get it on the dyno but not till its 100% working and i'm switching to a blend to see if it helps.

Edit: ZZP said a couple pages back that he thought it was in the upper 50's but i think they were over 30psi but don't quote me on that matt can chime in with accurate info.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 10:20 PM
  #880  
09BlueBaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-09
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 0
From: Davie, Fl
Have Nick drop you down to either E60 or E47. Then you may have enough fuel. Im expecting you to put down 475+whp
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 10:27 PM
  #881  
donkeyballs's Avatar
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-08-10
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 1
From: buffalo
Originally Posted by 09BlueBaltSS
Have Nick drop you down to either E60 or E47. Then you may have enough fuel. Im expecting you to put down 475+whp
Nick doesn't tune my car. I would think 450whp would be a good guess but only one way to find out.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 11:01 PM
  #882  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by gmtech16450yz
Lol. Love you too Matt.

So you talking the power you quote from your magic dyno or the numbers those cars do on an impartial, unbiased dyno when the customer gets their car back? There's usually about 100hp difference between those two. Hey guys, why do you think ZZP makes claims like what Matt just said above? Ever notice how ABSOLUTELY SURE they are that they make more power than anyone else? It's because they know they can manipulate the HP numbers higher than anyone else. Anyone that's that sure their HP numbers are higher than ANYONE else's is either ignorant or ???? I might know a little more about what goes on at ZZP than you might think.
Based on many of the things you post in here, I can confidently say that you know very little about what goes on at ZZP.

But you are right. There is a 100hp difference between actual power and what our dyno puts out. I gues I really only made 259 on pump gas with the stock turbo. Somehow I managed to trap 119 later that day. Must be a bogus track, too. Keep spreading the word if it makes you feel better...

Last edited by Matt M; Aug 18, 2011 at 11:16 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 11:09 PM
  #883  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by donkeyballs
What were your dyno numbers on pump gas only? I know a few people running the EFR and all seem to be pretty close and i know you guys are running your head/cam combo so that helps a bunch.

I have worked all the bugs out of mine finally but i'm out of fuel pressure on full E85 and can only hold 50% throttle and it still goes in reduce power from low fuel rail pressure Did you guys come out with the secondary injector kit yet or know of a way i can get this straightened out? On the upside I'm flowing over 50 maf lb/min @ half throttle lol so i know its gonna be a monster when running 100%
Stock head, actually.
Drop your car off here. We will make it run right on E85. Our fuel pump lobe alone is worth 20%. We have more tuning capabilities than most in this area as well. 50 lbs/min? Thats enough airflow for over 500whp on the LNF with E85.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 11:16 PM
  #884  
donkeyballs's Avatar
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-08-10
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 1
From: buffalo
Originally Posted by Matt M
Stock head, actually.
Drop your car off here. We will make it run right on E85. Our fuel pump lobe alone is worth 20%. We have more tuning capabilities than most in this area as well. 50 lbs/min? Thats enough airflow for over 500whp on the LNF with E85.
M-dubs is my tuner and he really didn't want to take it any farther till i hit a dyno to see where it was at so it didn't blow sky high lol.. But its def out of pressure the way it sits. And i have gained over 10 lb/min since M dubs got his hands on it and it was putting down 400/400 before so if it was 100% i wouldn't doubt 500whp.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 01:45 AM
  #885  
NME's Avatar
NME
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: florida
Originally Posted by gmtech16450yz
Lol. Love you too Matt.

So you talking the power you quote from your magic dyno or the numbers those cars do on an impartial, unbiased dyno when the customer gets their car back? There's usually about 100hp difference between those two. Hey guys, why do you think ZZP makes claims like what Matt just said above? Ever notice how ABSOLUTELY SURE they are that they make more power than anyone else? It's because they know they can manipulate the HP numbers higher than anyone else. Anyone that's that sure their HP numbers are higher than ANYONE else's is either ignorant or ???? I might know a little more about what goes on at ZZP than you might think.

ZZP Cobalt Bullseye Power S252 497whp at 27 psi - YouTube

So did they manipulate this guys dyno which gave a higher reading then zzp's dyno?

Turbo Swap Cobalt Runs 11.43 at 126! - YouTube

Did he have a 100 hp less? Then what he stated?

Your opinion and your statements are false. Which kinda makes you a liar.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 02:53 AM
  #886  
09BlueBaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-09
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 0
From: Davie, Fl
Originally Posted by donkeyballs
Nick doesn't tune my car. I would think 450whp would be a good guess but only one way to find out.
ahh...my bad thought you were using BYT. Are you spinning third with the DR's?
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 03:02 AM
  #887  
Fastgti69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
I'm ready for the EFR... I want to feel 4XX whp/wtq
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 07:17 AM
  #888  
ripped's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-08-09
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 08:17 AM
  #889  
kennysabarese's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-22-09
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: NNJ
FYI, according to the compressor map the max airflow the EFR 67mm compressor wheel is capable of is 48-50lbs/min

http://www.turbodriven.com/files/pdf...RTechPages.pdf
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 09:49 AM
  #890  
donkeyballs's Avatar
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-08-10
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 1
From: buffalo
Originally Posted by kennysabarese
FYI, according to the compressor map the max airflow the EFR 67mm compressor wheel is capable of is 48-50lbs/min

http://www.turbodriven.com/files/pdf...RTechPages.pdf
They also say its good to 450hp but i'm pertty sure ZZP blew that out of the water lol.. E85 makes a ton of power and i'm sure matt's car was in mid 50's lb/min. I really think this turbo was underrated.

Last edited by donkeyballs; Aug 19, 2011 at 01:44 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 09:58 AM
  #891  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
NME makes a great point. I dyno'd in the low 460s sae on our dyno, then drove straight to that open house where I dyno'd in the mid 490s sae on a Dynojet. Seemed about right to me.

The 6758 is under-rated. But that shouldn't be a surprise. The K04 is rated for less than we all push it to as well.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 10:59 AM
  #892  
09BlueBaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-09
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 0
From: Davie, Fl
Im no compressor map wiz but if im looking at that right the most efficient boost for the 6758 is around 21 psi yes??
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 11:01 AM
  #893  
kennysabarese's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-22-09
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: NNJ
Originally Posted by Matt M
The 6758 is under-rated. But that shouldn't be a surprise. The K04 is rated for less than we all push it to as well.
As long as there are no negative effects to pushing it outside of it's documented efficiency range, I'm cool with it!
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 11:37 AM
  #894  
donkeyballs's Avatar
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-08-10
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 1
From: buffalo
I haven't seen many ko4's **** the bed and some people are pushing them 30psi and the EFR has the best of everything so I don't see a problem.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 11:48 AM
  #895  
09BlueBaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-09
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 0
From: Davie, Fl
ring lands seem to go before the turbo
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 12:18 PM
  #896  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by Matt M
NME makes a great point. I dyno'd in the low 460s sae on our dyno, then drove straight to that open house where I dyno'd in the mid 490s sae on a Dynojet. Seemed about right to me.

The 6758 is under-rated. But that shouldn't be a surprise. The K04 is rated for less than we all push it to as well.
giggles clearly you manipulate everything.. you might as well draw your dynos in mspaint because they'd be more believable

/sarcasm lol
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 12:37 PM
  #897  
Mike08ss/tc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-25-09
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Originally Posted by donkeyballs
I haven't seen many ko4's **** the bed and some people are pushing them 30psi and the EFR has the best of everything so I don't see a problem.
my turbo is gone. gettting it fixed tuesd
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 01:13 PM
  #898  
cdnite's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-22-10
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: ATL GA
Just out of curiosity does anyone know the full model number for the stock LNF turbo?

K04-????

What about the turbine wheel diameter and length?

I think its 46mm Diameter X 44mm length is that right?

--Christian
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 01:42 PM
  #899  
donkeyballs's Avatar
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-08-10
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 1
From: buffalo
Originally Posted by Mike08ss/tc
my turbo is gone. gettting it fixed tuesd
How much boost were you running and did you have a boost leak or just normal abuse?
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 03:15 PM
  #900  
CudaJoe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-21-09
Posts: 11,280
Likes: 74
From: Newark, DE
Originally Posted by cdnite
Just out of curiosity does anyone know the full model number for the stock LNF turbo?

K04-????

What about the turbine wheel diameter and length?

I think its 46mm Diameter X 44mm length is that right?

--Christian
check bnrsupercars.com

he remakes busted turbo and can build hybrids for us. He has all the specs on the Cobalts k04 on their website.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 AM.